Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35954617›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

A Non-Randomized Pilot Study on the Benefits of Baby Swimming on Motor Development.

Irene Leo, Silvia Leone, Raffaele Dicataldo, Chiara Vivenzio, Nada Cavallin, Chiara Taglioni, Maja Roch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects of Exposure to Formal Aquatic Activities on Babies Younger Than 36 Months: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Irene LeoDepartment of Development and Socialization Psychology, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4925-4373
Silvia LeoneDepartment of Development and Socialization Psychology, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Raffaele DicataldoDepartment of Development and Socialization Psychology, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Chiara VivenzioDepartment of Development and Socialization Psychology, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Nada CavallinMamiù, Association for Baby-Swimming Activities, 35010 Padua, Italy.
Chiara TaglioniMamiù, Association for Baby-Swimming Activities, 35010 Padua, Italy.
Maja RochDepartment of Development and Socialization Psychology, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5604-9557

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to the concept of “embodied cognition”, motor development should not be considered distant from cognitive and language processes. Motor development is essential in the first 1000 days of life, as the child explores and learns new information from the environment. Among motor activities, baby swimming allows infants to make movements that they are not able to perform on solid ground. Since movements become slower in water, the sensory perception of these movements is amplified. However, the relationship between early swimming experience and motor development has not yet been investigated. Therefore, we carried out a pilot study with the aim of exploring this relationship for the first time. To that end, 32 infants aged from 6 to 10 months were recruited. The Peabody Developmental Motor Scale-2 was used to assess motor abilities in healthy children who regularly carried out aquatic courses compared to children who never attended swimming practice. Independent-sample t-tests showed significant differences in favor of the group that performed infant swimming activities on measures of reflexes (t = −2.2, p < 0.05), grasping (t = −3.8, p < 0.001), fine-motor quotient (t = −3.4, p < 0.01) and total-motor quotient (t = −2.4, p < 0.05). Overall, in line with the embodied cognition perspective, these preliminary results are encouraging and allow us to investigate how motor development influences later language development.

Indexed as

Language DevelopmentSwimmingChildChild DevelopmentCognitionHumansInfantLearningMotor SkillsPilot Projectsbaby swimmingembodied cognitionmotor development

Identifiers

PMID35954617
PMCPMC9368508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.