Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35954491›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Over-Detection of Melanoma-Suspect Lesions by a CE-Certified Smartphone App: Performance in Comparison to Dermatologists, 2D and 3D Convolutional Neural Networks in a Prospective Data Set of 1204 Pigmented Skin Lesions Involving Patients' Perception.

Anna Sophie Jahn, Alexander Andreas Navarini, Sara Elisa Cerminara, Lisa Kostner, Stephanie Marie Huber, Michael Kunz, Julia-Tatjana Maul, Reinhard Dummer, Seraina Sommer, Anja Dominique Neuner and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Artificial intelligence and skin cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anna Sophie JahnDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Alexander Andreas NavariniDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Sara Elisa CerminaraDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Lisa KostnerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Stephanie Marie HuberDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Michael KunzDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Julia-Tatjana MaulDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9914-1545
Reinhard DummerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2279-6906
Seraina SommerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Anja Dominique NeunerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Mitchell Paul LevesqueDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5902-9420
Phil Fang ChengDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2940-006X
Lara Valeska MaulDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9202-0073
University Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exponential increase in algorithm-based mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps) for melanoma screening is a reaction to a growing market. However, the performance of available apps remains to be investigated. In this prospective study, we investigated the diagnostic accuracy of a class 1 CE-certified smartphone app in melanoma risk stratification and its patient and dermatologist satisfaction. Pigmented skin lesions ≥ 3 mm and any suspicious smaller lesions were assessed by the smartphone app SkinVision

Indexed as

diagnostic accuracyearly detectionmelanomamobile health applicationover-detectionsmartphone

Identifiers

PMID35954491
PMCPMC9367531
OpenAlexW4290465970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.