Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35954397›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Long-term Mammography Utilization after an Initial Randomized Intervention Period by all Underserved Chilean Women in the Clinics.

Klaus Puschel, Andrea Rioseco, Gabriela Soto, Mario Palominos, Augusto León, Mauricio Soto, Beti Thompson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Klaus PuschelDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8320000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-1362-1311
Andrea RiosecoDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8320000, Chile.
Gabriela SotoDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8320000, Chile.
Mario PalominosDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8320000, Chile.
Augusto LeónDepartment of Surgical Oncology, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8330024, Chile.
Mauricio SotoDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8320000, Chile.
Beti ThompsonCancer Prevention Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue N. P.O. Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8519-649X

Funding

Radionovela to address cervical cancer and the HPV vaccine for rural HispanicsU01CA114633 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI THOMPSON, BETI · 2005 to 2010
$2.7M
Improving Breast Cancer Screening at the Primary Care LevelR03TW007900 · FIC · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI THOMPSON, BETI · 2007 to 2009
$114k
FIC NIH HHS R03 TW007900NCI NIH HHS U01 CA114633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chile has one of the highest rates of breast cancer in Latin America. Mammography rates among women, especially those of low socioeconomic status (SES), are thought to contribute to high breast cancer morbidity and mortality. A successful randomized controlled trial among women aged 50 to 70 in a low-SES primary care clinic in Chile led to a significant increase in mammography screening rates in a two-year intervention trial. This study assesses the sustainability of the intervention after ten years and identifies factors that might have been associated with a long-term effect using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework. The mammography rates among women aged 50 to 70 in the low-SES intervention clinic were compared to two populations of women aged 50 to 70 from middle-SES clinics and to national data. Qualitative data were used to answer questions of adoption, implementation, and maintenance, while quantitative data assessed the reach and effectiveness. After ten years, low-SES women at the intervention clinic maintained significantly higher mammography screening rates vs. middle-SES women at the comparison clinics (36.2% vs. 30.1% and 19.4% p < 0.0001). Women of a low SES at the intervention clinic also had significantly higher screening rates compared to women of a low SES at a national level (44.2% vs. 34.2% p < 0.0001). RE-AIM factors contributed to understanding the long-term difference in rates. Mailed contact, outreach interventions, and the integration of health promoters as part of the Community Advisory Board were important factors associated with the effects observed. This study provides information on factors that could contribute to reducing the social gap on breast cancer screening.

Indexed as

breast cancerChileLatin Americalow socioeconomic statusmammographyRE-AIM framework

Identifiers

PMID35954397
PMCPMC9367461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.