Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35954377›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Occupational Factors and Socioeconomic Differences in Breast Cancer Risk and Stage at Diagnosis in Swiss Working Women.

Jean-Luc Bulliard, Nicolas Bovio, Patrick Arveux, Yvan Bergeron, Arnaud Chiolero, Evelyne Fournier, Simon Germann, Isabelle Konzelmann, Manuela Maspoli, Elisabetta Rapiti and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Occupation and Female Breast Cancer Mortality in South Africa: A Case-Control Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Work-Related Factors and Lung Cancer Survival: A Population-Based Study in Switzerland (1990-2014).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jean-Luc BulliardCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9750-2709
Nicolas BovioCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2924-8670
Patrick ArveuxCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3340-1893
Yvan BergeronFribourg Cancer Registry, 1701 Fribourg, Switzerland.
Arnaud ChioleroPopulation Health Laboratory (#PopHealthLab), University of Fribourg, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.
Evelyne FournierGeneva Cancer Registry, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6717-8020
Simon GermannCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Isabelle KonzelmannValais Cancer Registry, Valais Health Observatory, 1950 Sion, Switzerland.
Manuela MaspoliNeuchâtel and Jura Cancer Registry, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Elisabetta RapitiGeneva Cancer Registry, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Irina Guseva CanuCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7059-8421
Centre universitaire de médecine générale et santé publique, Lausanne · CHHospital Neuchâtel · CHUniversity of Geneva · CHFribourg Development Agency · CHUniversity of Fribourg · CH

Funding

Swiss Cancer Research Foundation KFS-4699-02-2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Socioeconomic differences in breast cancer (BC) incidence are driven by differences in lifestyle, healthcare use and occupational exposure. Women of high socioeconomic status (SES) have a higher risk of BC, which is diagnosed at an earlier stage, than in low SES women. As the respective effects of occupation and SES remain unclear, we examined the relationships between occupation-related variables and BC incidence and stage when considering SES. Female residents of western Switzerland aged 18−65 years in the 1990 or 2000 census, with known occupation, were linked with records of five cancer registries to identify all primary invasive BC diagnosed between 1990 and 2014 in this region. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were computed by occupation using general female population incidence rates, with correction for multiple comparisons. Associations between occupation factors and BC incidence and stage at diagnosis were analysed by negative binomial and multinomial logistic regression models, respectively. The cohort included 381,873 women-years and 8818 malignant BC, with a mean follow-up of 14.7 years. Compared with reference, three occupational groups predominantly associated with a high socioprofessional status had SIRs > 1: legal professionals (SIR = 1.68, 95%CI: 1.27−2.23), social science workers (SIR = 1.29; 95%CI: 1.12−1.49) and some office workers (SIR = 1.14; 95%CI: 1.09−1.20). Conversely, building caretakers and cleaners had a reduced incidence of BC (SIR = 0.69, 95%CI: 0.59−0.81). Gradients in BC risk with skill and socioprofessional levels persisted when accounting for SES. A higher incidence was generally associated with a higher probability of an early-stage BC. Occupation and SES may both contribute to differences in risk and stage at diagnosis of BC.

Indexed as

breast cancerincidenceinequalitiesoccupationrisksocioeconomic statusstageSwitzerland

Identifiers

PMID35954377
PMCPMC9367372
OpenAlexW4289110449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.