Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35954370›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Deep Neural Network Models for Colon Cancer Screening.

Muthu Subash Kavitha, Prakash Gangadaran, Aurelia Jackson, Balu Alagar Venmathi Maran, Takio Kurita, Byeong-Cheol Ahn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muthu Subash KavithaSchool of Information and Data Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan.
Prakash GangadaranBK21 FOUR KNU Convergence Educational Program of Biomedical Sciences for Creative Future Talents, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0658-4604
Aurelia JacksonBorneo Marine Research Institute, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu 88400, Malaysia.
Balu Alagar Venmathi MaranBorneo Marine Research Institute, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu 88400, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-1090-5295
Takio KuritaGraduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8521, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3982-6750
Byeong-Cheol AhnBK21 FOUR KNU Convergence Educational Program of Biomedical Sciences for Creative Future Talents, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7700-3929

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early detection of colorectal cancer can significantly facilitate clinicians' decision-making and reduce their workload. This can be achieved using automatic systems with endoscopic and histological images. Recently, the success of deep learning has motivated the development of image- and video-based polyp identification and segmentation. Currently, most diagnostic colonoscopy rooms utilize artificial intelligence methods that are considered to perform well in predicting invasive cancer. Convolutional neural network-based architectures, together with image patches and preprocesses are often widely used. Furthermore, learning transfer and end-to-end learning techniques have been adopted for detection and localization tasks, which improve accuracy and reduce user dependence with limited datasets. However, explainable deep networks that provide transparency, interpretability, reliability, and fairness in clinical diagnostics are preferred. In this review, we summarize the latest advances in such models, with or without transparency, for the prediction of colorectal cancer and also address the knowledge gap in the upcoming technology.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecolorectal cancerinterpretationneural networktransfer learningtransparency

Identifiers

PMID35954370
PMCPMC9367621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.