ArticleCancers2022
Clinical Impact of Dual Time Point
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiologic-pathologic discrepancy in the tumor size assessment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the era of preoperative therapy.Surgery today · 2026Review
- Dual-time-point [EJNMMI research · 2026Article
- Surgery based on resectability status of pancreatic cancer: a narrative review.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Postoperative recurrence of pancreatic cancer controlled for 9 months solely by severe carbohydrate restriction: ketogenic diet.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Preoperative CA19‑9 level and dual time point FDG‑PET/CT as strong biological indicators of borderline resectability in pancreatic cancer: A retrospective study.Oncology letters · 2024Article
- Comparison of early and lateScientific reports · 2023Article
- Paget Disease as Common Pitfall on PET with Different Radiopharmaceuticals in Oncology: Not All That Glitters Is Gold!Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We examined the value of preoperative dual time point (DTP) 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography fusion imaging (FDG PET/CT) as a predictor of early recurrence or the outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer. Standardized uptake values (SUVs) in DTP FDG PET/CT were performed as preoperative staging. SUVmax1 and SUVmax2 were obtained in 60 min and 120 min, respectively. ΔSUVmax% was defined as (SUVmax2 − SUVmax1)/SUVmax1 × 100. The optimal cut-off values for SUVmax parameters were selected based on tumor relapse within 1 year of surgery. Optimal cut-off values for SUVmax1 and ΔSUVmax% were 7.18 and 24.25, respectively. The combination of SUVmax1 and ΔSUVmax% showed higher specificity and sensitivity, and higher positive and negative predictive values for tumor relapse within 1 year than SUVmax1 alone. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was significantly worse in the subgroups of high SUVmax1 and high ΔSUVmax% (median 7.0 months) than in the other subgroups (p < 0.0001). The multivariate Cox analysis of RFS identified high SUVmax1 and high ΔSUVmax% as independent prognostic factors (p = 0.0060). DTP FDG PET/CT may effectively predict relapse in patients with pancreatic cancer. The combination of SUVmax1 and ΔSUVmax% identified early recurrent patient groups more precisely than SUVmax1 alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.