Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35954165›Full record

ArticleCells2022

Deep Learning-Based Image Analysis for the Quantification of Tumor-Induced Angiogenesis in the 3D In Vivo Tumor Model-Establishment and Addition to Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI).

Paulina Mena Kuri, Eric Pion, Lina Mahl, Philipp Kainz, Siegfried Schwarz, Christoph Brochhausen, Thiha Aung, Silke Haerteis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. A Comprehensive Look at In Vitro Angiogenesis Image Analysis Software.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paulina Mena KuriInstitute for Molecular and Cellular Anatomy, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Eric PionInstitute for Molecular and Cellular Anatomy, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Lina MahlInstitute for Molecular and Cellular Anatomy, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Philipp KainzKML Vision GmbH, 8020 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7970-370X
Siegfried SchwarzKML Vision GmbH, 8020 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3404-4397
Christoph BrochhausenInstitute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Thiha AungInstitute for Molecular and Cellular Anatomy, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Silke HaerteisInstitute for Molecular and Cellular Anatomy, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9440-3307
University of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: angiogenesis plays an important role in the growth and metastasis of tumors. We established the CAM assay application, an image analysis software of the IKOSA platform by KML Vision, for the quantification of blood vessels with the in ovo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model. We added this proprietary deep learning algorithm to the already established laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI). (2) Methods: angiosarcoma cell line tumors were grafted onto the CAM. Angiogenesis was measured at the beginning and at the end of tumor growth with both measurement methods. The CAM assay application was trained to enable the recognition of in ovo CAM vessels. Histological stains of the tissue were performed and gluconate, an anti-angiogenic substance, was applied to the tumors. (3) Results: the angiosarcoma cells formed tumors on the CAM that appeared to stay vital and proliferated. An increase in perfusion was observed using both methods. The CAM assay application was successfully established in the in ovo CAM model and anti-angiogenic effects of gluconate were observed. (4) Conclusions: the CAM assay application appears to be a useful method for the quantification of angiogenesis in the CAM model and gluconate could be a potential treatment of angiosarcomas. Both aspects should be evaluated in further research.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHemangiosarcomaAnimalsChorioallantoic MembraneGluconatesLaser Speckle Contrast ImagingNeovascularization, PathologicGluconates3D in vivo tumor modelangiogenesisartificial intelligenceblood circulationCAM assay applicationchorioallantoic membrane (CAM)deep learningimage analysis softwarelaser speckle contrast imagingtumor

Identifiers

PMID35954165
PMCPMC9367525
OpenAlexW4288446623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.