ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Visual Detection of Chicken Adulteration Based on a Lateral Flow Strip-PCR Strategy.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Amplification-Free Quantification of Donkey DNA for Authenticating Colla Corii Asini with a Time-Resolved Fluorescent Lateral Flow Assay Based on Eu-MOFs.Journal of fluorescence · 2026Article
- Developing a recombinase-aided amplification method combined with a lateral flow dipstick assay for rapid triplex detection of bovine coronavirus, infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus, and bovine viral diarrhea virus.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Highly Sensitive and Specific Lateral Flow Detection for DNA Methylation Based on GIaI-Mediated Specific-Terminal-Mediated Polymerase Chain Reaction.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Accurate molecular identification of different meat adulterations without carryover contaminations on a microarray chip PCR-directed microfluidic lateral flow strip device.Food chemistry. Molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study was to develop an accurate, easy-to-use, and cost-effective method for the detection of chicken adulteration based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and lateral flow strip (LFS). We compared six DNA extraction methods, namely the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method, salt method, urea method, SDS method, guanidine isothiocyanate method, and commercial kit method. The chicken cytb gene was used as a target to design specific primers. The specificity and sensitivity of the PCR-LFS system were tested using a self-assembled lateral flow measurement sensor. The results showed that the DNA concentration obtained by salt methods is up to 533 ± 84 ng µL
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.