Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35954038›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Consumer Perception and Acceptability of Plant-Based Alternatives to Chicken.

Laurel Ettinger, Anika Falkeisen, Sophie Knowles, Mackenzie Gorman, Sophie Barker, Rachael Moss, Matthew B McSweeney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Rethinking Plant Proteins: Innovations in Nutrition, Processing, and Food Development.Plant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laurel EttingerSchool of Nutrition and Dietetics, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS B4P 2K5, Canada.
Anika FalkeisenSchool of Nutrition and Dietetics, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS B4P 2K5, Canada.
Sophie KnowlesSchool of Nutrition and Dietetics, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS B4P 2K5, Canada.
Mackenzie GormanSchool of Nutrition and Dietetics, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS B4P 2K5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5350-5967
Sophie BarkerSchool of Nutrition and Dietetics, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS B4P 2K5, Canada.
Rachael MossSchool of Nutrition and Dietetics, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS B4P 2K5, Canada.
Matthew B McSweeneySchool of Nutrition and Dietetics, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS B4P 2K5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8937-5639

Funding

Canada Foundation for Innovation 37528Research Nova Scotia N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of plant-based alternatives (PBAs) to meat in the marketplace has been increasing in recent years due to consumer demand. One of these plant-based products has aimed to mimic chicken products, specifically chicken nuggets. However, few sensory studies have been conducted on these products. The objective of this study is to evaluate the sensory properties, acceptability, and consumer perception of these PBAs. Participants (

Indexed as

alternative proteinconsumer acceptanceimitation meatmeat analoguesensory analysis

Identifiers

PMID35954038
PMCPMC9367704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.