Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35953998›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

A Comparison of Methods to Maintain the Equine Cecal Microbial Environment In Vitro Utilizing Cecal and Fecal Material.

Jennifer L MacNicol, Simone Renwick, Caroline M Ganobis, Emma Allen-Vercoe, Jeffery Scott Weese, Wendy Pearson

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer L MacNicolDepartment of Animal Biosciences, Ontario Agricultural College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8670-461X
Simone RenwickDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Biological Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Caroline M GanobisDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Biological Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Emma Allen-VercoeDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Biological Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8716-327X
Jeffery Scott WeeseDepartment of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Wendy PearsonDepartment of Animal Biosciences, Ontario Agricultural College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3635-4594
University of Guelph · CA

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council N/ASelected Bioprodcts INC. N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The equine gastrointestinal (GI) microbiota is intimately related to the horse. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the microbiome and metabolome of cecal inoculum maintained in an anaerobic chamber or chemostat batch fermenter, as well as the fecal slurry maintained in an anaerobic chamber over 48 h. Cecal and fecal content were collected from healthy adult horses immediately upon death. Cecal fluid was used to inoculate chemostat vessels (chemostat cecal,

Indexed as

cecumgastrointestinalhorsemetabolomemicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID35953998
PMCPMC9367579
OpenAlexW4290704683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.