Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35953988›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Rapid Nucleic Acid Extraction for Aquatic Animal DNA Virus Determination Using Chelex 100 Resin via Conventional PCR and Digital Droplet PCR Detection.

Xi Hu, Nan Jiang, Yiqun Li, Yong Zhou, Yuding Fan, Mingyang Xue, Lingbing Zeng, Wenzhi Liu, Yan Meng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xi HuNational Demonstration Center for Experimental Fisheries Science Education, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.
Nan JiangYangtze River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuhan 430223, China.
Yiqun LiYangtze River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuhan 430223, China.
Yong ZhouYangtze River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuhan 430223, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0373-5734
Yuding FanYangtze River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuhan 430223, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7291-2493
Mingyang XueYangtze River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuhan 430223, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3370-5712
Lingbing ZengYangtze River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuhan 430223, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7196-0955
Wenzhi LiuYangtze River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuhan 430223, China.
Yan MengYangtze River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuhan 430223, China.
Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences · CNShanghai Ocean University · CN

Funding

Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund No. 2020TD44Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System CARS-45-16National Freshwater Aquatic Germplasm Resource Center FGRC18537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular diagnostic testing for viral pathogens is crucial in aquaculture. The efficient and convenient preparation of pathogenic microbial nucleic acids is the basis of molecular diagnosis. Here, we developed a simplified deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extraction method from aquatic animal DNA viruses using the Chelex 100 resin. The nucleic acid was extracted from infected tissues and cell culture for the detection of three common aquatic viral pathogens (CEV, CyHV-2, and GSIV). We compared the extraction effects of a current commercial kit extraction method and the Chelex 100 resin extraction method according to nucleic acid concentration, conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). The results indicated that both extraction procedures could obtain high-quality nucleotide samples. Extracting DNA using the Chelex 100 resin led to better detective efficiency for ddPCR molecular diagnostic testing. The whole process took less than 20 min, and only Chelex 100 resin solution was added to the tissues or cells without multiple tubes being transferred several times. The extracted DNA concentration and the detection sensitivity were high. These results indicated that the Chelex 100 resin solution has the advantages of speed, efficiency, and economy compared to the commercial kit. In addition, the higher pH value (10-11) of the Chelex 100 resin solution markedly improved the detection sensitivity compared to a lower pH value (9-10). In conclusion, the comparison of the Chelex 100 Resin and commercial viral DNA extraction kits revealed the good performance of the Chelex 100 resin solution at pH 10-11 in DNA extraction for PCR amplification from aquatic animal viral samples of tissues and cells in molecular diagnostic testing. It is both rapid and cost-effective.

Indexed as

aquatic animal virusChelex 100 resindeoxyribonucleic acid preparationdetection

Identifiers

PMID35953988
PMCPMC9367309
OpenAlexW4290706117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.