Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35953971›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

The Economic Burden of Chromosome Translocations and the Benefits of Enhanced Screening for Cattle Breeding.

Nicole M Lewis, Carla Canedo-Ribeiro, Claudia C Rathje, Rebecca L Jennings, Maxim Danihel, Lisa M Bosman, Giuseppe Silvestri, Darren K Griffin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Advances in Dairy Cattle Reproduction-A Foreword.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicole M LewisSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NH, UK.
Carla Canedo-RibeiroSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1575-7420
Claudia C RathjeSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NH, UK.
Rebecca L JenningsSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NH, UK.
Maxim DanihelSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NH, UK.
Lisa M BosmanSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0525-3819
Giuseppe SilvestriSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5496-2470
Darren K GriffinSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7595-3226
University of Kent · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cattle breeding industry, through both of its derivatives (dairy and beef), provides 81% of milk and 22% of meat required globally. If a breeding bull is sub-fertile, this impacts herd conception and birth rates, and it is generally accepted that having a proactive genetic screening programme can prevent further losses. Chromosome translocations are the leading genetic cause of infertility in livestock and, in cattle, this extends beyond the classical 1:29 to other Robertsonian translocations (RobTs) and to reciprocal translocations (RECTs). The incidence of both (collectively termed RTs) varies between breeds and herds; however, we estimate that RECTs are, most likely, at least twice as common as RobTs. The purpose of this study was to develop an industry economic model to estimate the financial impact of an RT event at the herd level. If we assume a conservative incidence rate of 0.4% for Rob1:29 with each one impacting the conception rate by 5%, we calculate that actively screening for and removing a Rob1:29 bull could benefit an impacted herd by GBP 2.3 million (approx. USD 2.8 million) over six years. A recently updated screening protocol developed in our lab for all RTs, however (with a projected combined incidence of 1.2%, impacting conception rates by 10%), could benefit an impacted herd by GBP 7.2 million (nearly USD 9 million) for each RT found. For an industry worth USD 827.4 billion (dairy) and USD 467.7 billion (beef), expanding knowledge on incidence and further dissection of the potential costs (financial and environmental) from RTs is essential to prevent further losses.

Indexed as

1:29AIchromosomecytogenetic screeningfertilityfinancial modelFISHreciprocal translocationRobertsonian translocation

Identifiers

PMID35953971
PMCPMC9367566
OpenAlexW4290466604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.