Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35953925›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Used to Define the Optimum Needle Length in Pigs of Different Ages.

Maren Bernau, Ulrike Gerster, Armin Manfred Scholz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maren BernauLivestock Center Oberschleissheim, Veterinary Faculty of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, St. Hubertusstrasse 12, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8161-0342
Ulrike GersterLivestock Center Oberschleissheim, Veterinary Faculty of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, St. Hubertusstrasse 12, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany.
Armin Manfred ScholzLivestock Center Oberschleissheim, Veterinary Faculty of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, St. Hubertusstrasse 12, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7075-0067

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intramuscular injections result in tissue destruction and alteration. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the optimum injection point for intramuscular injections. As animals—especially pigs—vary in size and explicit information about injection depth is not available. To determine the predicted optimum injection depth, magnetic resonance imaging was used in pigs of different ages and weight groups. In total, 730 magnetic resonance images of 136 pigs were used to calculate the optimum injection depth for intramuscular injections. Four age groups were evaluated: <29 days of age, 29−70 days of age, 71−117 days of age and >170 days of age. For fattening pigs (71−117 days of age), the present study recommends a needle length of 20 mm (range: 40−58 mm). For younger pigs (<70 days of age), a needle length of 12 to 14 mm (range: 10−18 mm), and for older pigs (>170 days of age), a needle length of 30 mm (range: 25−37 mm) is recommended. However, more data are needed. Therefore, further studies are necessary, especially in the youngest (suckling pigs) and oldest (sows) age groups, as these are the groups mainly injected/vaccinated. Additionally, age and weight should be examined in more detail compared to fat distribution in the neck, genetics and the sex of the animal.

Indexed as

animal welfareinjection depthmagnetic resonance imagingpigs

Identifiers

PMID35953925
PMCPMC9367419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.