Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35953846›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2022

The telomere maintenance mechanism spectrum and its dynamics in gliomas.

Sojin Kim, Tamrin Chowdhury, Hyeon Jong Yu, Jee Ye Kahng, Chae Eun Lee, Seung Ah Choi, Kyung-Min Kim, Ho Kang, Joo Ho Lee, Soon-Tae Lee and 20 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Techniques for assessing telomere length: A methodological review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Telomeres and telomerase in Sarcoma disease and therapy.International journal of medical sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Cellular senescence in glioma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sojin Kim *Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Tamrin Chowdhury *Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Hyeon Jong YuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Jee Ye KahngSeoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Chae Eun LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Seung Ah ChoiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Kyung-Min KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Ho KangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Joo Ho LeeSeoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Soon-Tae LeeSeoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Kyung WonSeoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Kyung Hyun KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Min-Sung KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Ji Yeoun LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Jin Wook KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Yong-Hwy KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Tae Min KimSeoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Seung Hong ChoiSeoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Ji Hoon PhiSeoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Young-Kyoung ShinSeoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Ja-Lok KuSeoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Sungyoung LeeDepartment of Genomic Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Hongseok YunDepartment of Genomic Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Hwajin LeeBiomedical Knowledge Engineering Laboratory and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Dokyoung KimDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, 02447, Republic of Korea.
Kyoungmi KimDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Department of Physiology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
Junho K HurDepartment of Genetics, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, Korea.
Sung-Hye ParkSeoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Seung-Ki KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Chul-Kee ParkDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea. nsckpark@snu.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-2350-9876
Seoul National University · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRHanyang University · KRKyung Hee University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe activation of the telomere maintenance mechanism (TMM) is one of the critical drivers of cancer cell immortality. In gliomas, TERT expression and TERT promoter mutation are considered to reliably indicate telomerase activation, while ATRX mutation and/or loss indicates an alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT). However, these relationships have not been extensively validated in tumor tissues.

methodsTelomerase repeated amplification protocol (TRAP) and C-circle assays were used to profile and characterize the TMM cross-sectionally (n = 412) and temporally (n = 133) across glioma samples. WES, RNA-seq, and NanoString analyses were performed to identify and validate the genetic characteristics of the TMM groups.

resultsWe show through the direct measurement of telomerase activity and ALT in a large set of glioma samples that the TMM in glioma cannot be defined solely by the combination of telomerase activity and ALT, regardless of TERT expression, TERT promoter mutation, and ATRX loss. Moreover, we observed that a considerable proportion of gliomas lacked both telomerase activity and ALT. This telomerase activation-negative and ALT negative group exhibited evidence of slow growth potential. By analyzing a set of longitudinal samples from a separate cohort of glioma patients, we discovered that the TMM is not fixed and can change with glioma progression.

conclusionsThis study suggests that the TMM is dynamic and reflects the plasticity and oncogenicity of tumor cells. Direct measurement of telomerase enzyme activity and evidence of ALT should be considered when defining TMM. An accurate understanding of the TMM in glioma is expected to provide important information for establishing cancer management strategies.

Indexed as

GliomaTelomeraseHumansMutationTelomereTelomere HomeostasisTelomeraseALTGliomaTelomere maintenance mechanismTERT

Identifiers

PMID35953846
PMCPMC9367055
OpenAlexW4291020914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.