Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35953815›Full record

ArticleRespiratory research2022

Dynamic early warning scores for predicting clinical deterioration in patients with respiratory disease.

Sherif Gonem, Adam Taylor, Grazziela Figueredo, Sarah Forster, Philip Quinlan, Jonathan M Garibaldi, Tricia M McKeever, Dominick Shaw

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sherif GonemDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK. sherif.gonem@nottingham.ac.uk.
Adam TaylorDigital Research Service, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Grazziela FigueredoDigital Research Service, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Sarah ForsterNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Philip QuinlanDigital Research Service, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Jonathan M GaribaldiSchool of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Tricia M McKeeverNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Dominick ShawDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.
University of Nottingham · GBNottingham Biomedical Research Centre · GBNottingham City Hospital · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T024518/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe National Early Warning Score-2 (NEWS-2) is used to detect patient deterioration in UK hospitals but fails to take account of the detailed granularity or temporal trends in clinical observations. We used data-driven methods to develop dynamic early warning scores (DEWS) to address these deficiencies, and tested their accuracy in patients with respiratory disease for predicting (1) death or intensive care unit admission, occurring within 24 h (D/ICU), and (2) clinically significant deterioration requiring urgent intervention, occurring within 4 h (CSD).

methodsClinical observations data were extracted from electronic records for 31,590 respiratory in-patient episodes from April 2015 to December 2020 at a large acute NHS Trust. The timing of D/ICU was extracted for all episodes. 1100 in-patient episodes were annotated manually to record the timing of CSD, defined as a specific event requiring a change in treatment. Time series features were entered into logistic regression models to derive DEWS for each of the clinical outcomes. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was the primary measure of model accuracy.

resultsAUROC (95% confidence interval) for predicting D/ICU was 0.857 (0.852-0.862) for NEWS-2 and 0.906 (0.899-0.914) for DEWS in the validation data. AUROC for predicting CSD was 0.829 (0.817-0.842) for NEWS-2 and 0.877 (0.862-0.892) for DEWS. NEWS-2 ≥ 5 had sensitivity of 88.2% and specificity of 54.2% for predicting CSD, while DEWS ≥ 0.021 had higher sensitivity of 93.6% and approximately the same specificity of 54.3% for the same outcome. Using these cut-offs, 315 out of 347 (90.8%) CSD events were detected by both NEWS-2 and DEWS, at the time of the event or within the previous 4 h; 12 (3.5%) were detected by DEWS but not by NEWS-2, while 4 (1.2%) were detected by NEWS-2 but not by DEWS; 16 (4.6%) were not detected by either scoring system.

conclusionWe have developed DEWS that display greater accuracy than NEWS-2 for predicting clinical deterioration events in patients with respiratory disease. Prospective validation studies are required to assess whether DEWS can be used to reduce missed deteriorations and false alarms in real-life clinical settings.

Indexed as

Clinical DeteriorationEarly Warning ScoreRespiration DisordersRespiratory Tract DiseasesHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveClinical deteriorationEarly warning scoreRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID35953815
PMCPMC9367123
OpenAlexW4292729077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.