Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35953803›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2022

ProbeTools: designing hybridization probes for targeted genomic sequencing of diverse and hypervariable viral taxa.

Kevin S Kuchinski, Jun Duan, Chelsea Himsworth, William Hsiao, Natalie A Prystajecky

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Enrichment techniques for clinical metagenomics.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. OLTA: Optimizing bait seLection for TArgeted sequencing.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin S KuchinskiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. kevin.kuchinski@bccdc.ca.
Jun DuanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Chelsea HimsworthAnimal Health Centre, British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Fisheries, Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada.
William HsiaoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Natalie A PrystajeckyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CABC Centre for Disease Control · CASimon Fraser University · CA

Funding

CANARIE Research Software Program RS3-073Genome British Columbia UPP025Investment Agriculture Foundation of British Columbia A0822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSequencing viruses in many specimens is hindered by excessive background material from hosts, microbiota, and environmental organisms. Consequently, enrichment of target genomic material is necessary for practical high-throughput viral genome sequencing. Hybridization probes are widely used for enrichment in many fields, but their application to viral sequencing faces a major obstacle: it is difficult to design panels of probe oligo sequences that broadly target many viral taxa due to their rapid evolution, extensive diversity, and genetic hypervariability. To address this challenge, we created ProbeTools, a package of bioinformatic tools for generating effective viral capture panels, and for assessing coverage of target sequences by probe panel designs in silico. In this study, we validated ProbeTools by designing a panel of 3600 probes for subtyping the hypervariable haemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) genome segments of avian-origin influenza A viruses (AIVs). Using in silico assessment of AIV reference sequences and in vitro capture on egg-cultured viral isolates, we demonstrated effective performance by our custom AIV panel and ProbeTools' suitability for challenging viral probe design applications.

resultsBased on ProbeTool's in silico analysis, our panel provided broadly inclusive coverage of 14,772 HA and 11,967 NA reference sequences. For each reference sequence, we calculated the percentage of nucleotide positions covered by our panel in silico; 90% of HA and NA references sequences had at least 90.8 and 95.1% of their nucleotide positions covered respectively. We also observed effective in vitro capture on a representative collection of 23 egg-cultured AIVs that included isolates from wild birds, poultry, and humans and representatives from all HA and NA subtypes. Forty-two of forty-six HA and NA segments had over 98.3% of their nucleotide positions significantly enriched by our custom panel. These in vitro results were further used to validate ProbeTools' in silico coverage assessment algorithm; 89.2% of in silico predictions were concordant with in vitro results.

conclusionsProbeTools generated an effective panel for subtyping AIVs that can be deployed for genomic surveillance, outbreak prevention, and pandemic preparedness. Effective probe design against hypervariable AIV targets also validated ProbeTools' design and coverage assessment algorithms, demonstrating their suitability for other challenging viral capture applications.

Indexed as

Influenza A virusInfluenza in BirdsAnimalsGenomicsHumansNeuraminidaseNucleotidesPhylogenyNeuraminidaseNucleotidesAvian influenza virusesHybridization probe captureInfluenza a virusesTargeted genomic sequencingViral genomicsViral surveillance

Identifiers

PMID35953803
PMCPMC9371634
OpenAlexW4291000570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.