Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35953778›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2022

Cost effectiveness of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate for the treatment of hyperkalaemia in patients with CKD in Norway and Sweden.

Kun Kim, Josefine Fagerström, Gengshi Chen, Zoya Lagunova, Hans Furuland, Phil McEwan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Management of hyperkalemia: Expert consensus from Kuwait - a Modified Delphi Approach.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kun KimAstraZeneca, Södertälje, Sweden.
Josefine FagerströmAstraZeneca, Södertälje, Sweden.
Gengshi ChenAstraZeneca, Academy House, 136 Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 8PA, UK. Gengshi.Chen@AstraZeneca.com.
Zoya LagunovaAstraZeneca, Oslo, Norway.
Hans FurulandDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Phil McEwanHEOR Ltd, Cardiff, UK.
AstraZeneca (Sweden) · SEAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBHealth Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom) · GBUppsala University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHyperkalaemia is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is associated with a range of adverse outcomes. Historically, options for management of chronic hyperkalaemia in the outpatient setting have been limited. Novel oral potassium binders provide a safe, effective therapy for maintenance of normokalaemia in patients with CKD, but despite being approved for reimbursement in many countries, prescription data indicate uptake has been slower than anticipated. This analysis aimed to demonstrate the value to patients and the healthcare system of the potassium binder sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) for treatment of hyperkalaemia in patients with CKD in Norway and Sweden.

methodsA published simulation model reflecting the natural history of CKD was adapted to the Norwegian and Swedish settings and used to predict long-term health economic outcomes of treating hyperkalaemia with SZC versus usual care.

resultsSZC was highly cost effective compared to usual care in Norway and Sweden, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of €14,838/QALY in Norway and €14,352/QALY in Sweden, over a lifetime horizon. The acquisition cost of SZC was largely offset by cost savings associated with reductions in hyperkalaemia events and hospitalisations; a modest overall increase in costs was predominantly attributable to costs associated with gains in life years compared with usual care. SZC remained cost effective in all scenarios examined.

conclusionsSZC was estimated to be cost effective for treating hyperkalaemia. Consequently, improving access to a clinically effective, safe and cost-effective therapy, such as SZC, may result in considerable benefits for CKD patients with hyperkalaemia.

Indexed as

HyperkalemiaRenal Insufficiency, ChronicCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansPotassiumSilicatesSwedenPotassiumSilicatessodium zirconium cyclosilicateCKDCost effectivenessHyperkalaemiaPotassium binderRAASi optimisation

Identifiers

PMID35953778
PMCPMC9373488
OpenAlexW4291000755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.