Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35953709›Full record

ArticleNature plants2022

The role of phylogenetic relatedness on alien plant success depends on the stage of invasion.

Ali Omer, Trevor Fristoe, Qiang Yang, Mialy Razanajatovo, Patrick Weigelt, Holger Kreft, Wayne Dawson, Stefan Dullinger, Franz Essl, Jan Pergl and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature plants, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Historical frequency of plants in nursery catalogues predicts likelihood of naturalization in ornamental species.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ali OmerEcology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany. ali.omer@uni-konstanz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5687-3386
Trevor FristoeEcology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Qiang YangEcology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4210-9007
Mialy RazanajatovoEcology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Patrick WeigeltBiodiversity, Macroecology & Biogeography, University of Goettingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2485-3708
Holger KreftBiodiversity, Macroecology & Biogeography, University of Goettingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4471-8236
Wayne DawsonDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3402-0774
Stefan DullingerDivision of Biodiversity Dynamics and Conservation, Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3919-0887
Franz EsslBioInvasions, Global Change, Macroecology-Group, Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jan PerglDepartment of Invasion Ecology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Průhonice, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0045-1974
Petr PyšekDepartment of Invasion Ecology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
Mark van KleunenEcology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2861-3701

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 3757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Darwin's naturalization hypothesis predicts successful alien invaders to be distantly related to native species, whereas his pre-adaptation hypothesis predicts the opposite. It has been suggested that depending on the invasion stage (that is, introduction, naturalization and invasiveness), both hypotheses, now known as Darwin's naturalization conundrum, could hold true. We tested this by analysing whether the likelihood of introduction for cultivation, as well as the subsequent stages of naturalization and spread (that is, becoming invasive) of species alien to Southern Africa are correlated with their phylogenetic distance to the native flora of this region. Although species are more likely to be introduced for cultivation if they are distantly related to the native flora, the probability of subsequent naturalization was higher for species closely related to the native flora. Furthermore, the probability of becoming invasive was higher for naturalized species distantly related to the native flora. These results were consistent across three different metrics of phylogenetic distance. Our study reveals that the relationship between phylogenetic distance to the native flora and the success of an alien species changes from one invasion stage to the other.

Indexed as

EcosystemIntroduced SpeciesAdaptation, PhysiologicalPhylogenyPlants

Identifiers

PMID35953709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.