ArticleScientific reports2022
The effects of substrate and stacking in bilayer borophene.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Borophene: Crucial Challenges and the Way Forward.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Exploring the structure and properties of α-sheet based bilayer borophenes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bilayer borophene has recently attracted much interest due to its outstanding mechanical and electronic properties. The interlayer interactions of these bilayers are reported differently in theoretical and experimental studies. Herein, we design and investigate bilayer [Formula: see text] borophene, by first-principles calculations. Our results show that the interlayer distance of the relaxed AA-stacked bilayer is about 2.5 Å, suggesting a van der Waals interlayer interaction. However, this is not supported by previous experiments, therefore by constraining the interlayer distance, we propose a preferred model which is close to experimental records. This preferred model has one covalent interlayer bond in every unit cell (single-pillar). Further, we argue that the preferred model is nothing but the relaxed model under a 2% compression. Additionally, we designed three substrate-supported bilayers on the Ag, Al, and Au substrates, which lead to double-pillar structures. Afterward, we investigate the AB stacking, which forms covalent bonds in the relaxed form, without the need for compression or substrate. Moreover, phonon dispersion shows that, unlike the AA stacking, the AB stacking is stable in freestanding form. Subsequently, we calculate the mechanical properties of the AA and AB stackings. The ultimate strengths of the AA and the AB stackings are 29.72 N/m at 12% strain and 23.18 N/m at 8% strain, respectively. Moreover, the calculated Young's moduli are 419 N/m and 356 N/m for the AA and the AB stackings, respectively. These results show the superiority of bilayer borophene over bilayer [Formula: see text] in terms of stiffness and compliance. Our results can pave the way of future studies on bilayer borophene structures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.