Trial reportGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2023
15-year outcomes of the JOCRI study (JOCRIED study): a randomised comparison of off-pump and on-pump multiple arterial coronary revascularisation.
Trial report in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with chronic postsurgical pain among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: follow-up of a randomized, clinical trial.Journal of anesthesia · 2023Trial
- Plasma leukocyte-derived extracellular vesicles are related to target vessel revascularization in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Metabolomic Responses in On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe Japanese Off-Pump Coronary Revascularization Investigation (JOCRI) study reported a non-significant difference in early outcomes and graft patency between off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in 2005. The JOCRIED study aimed to review the long-term outcomes of the JOCRI study participants. METHOD AND
resultsThe JOCRIED study enrolled 123 of the JOCRI study participants completing the clinical follow-up between August 2018 and August 2020; 61 patients in the off-pump group and 62 patients in the on-pump group. The follow-up period was 13.8 ± 2.8 years. The groups were compared regarding mortality, the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events and repeat revascularisation. The 15-year cumulative survival rate (off-pump vs on-pump, respectively; 77.7% vs 75.3%; p = 0.85), major adverse events-free survival rate (62.5% vs 55.6%; p = 0.27) and repeat revascularisation-free rate (84.8% vs 78.0%; p = 0.16) were not significantly different between the two groups. Revascularisation was the most common major adverse events in the JOCRIED participants. Although percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 8 patients (13%) in the off-pump group and in 14 patients (23%) in the on-pump group (p = 0.23), no patients underwent redo coronary artery bypass grafting.
conclusionsOff-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides comparable 15-year outcomes to on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.