Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35953601›Full record

SynthesisCurrent oncology reports2022

A Systematic Review and a Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials' Control Groups in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (mHSPC).

Giuseppe Napoli, Stefano Arcangeli, Bruno Fionda, Fernando Munoz, Umberto Tebano, Emilia Durante, Marcello Tucci, Roberto Bortolus, Marco Muraro, Giulia Rinaldi and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current oncology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Is [Cancers · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Giuseppe NapoliDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, AULSS 9 Scaligera, Verona, Italy.
Stefano ArcangeliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Bruno Fionda *U.O.C. Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Fernando Munoz *Radiation Oncology Unit, Regional Hospital of Aosta, Aosta, Italy.
Umberto TebanoDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, AULSS 9 Scaligera, Verona, Italy.
Emilia DuranteDepartment of Medical Oncology, AULSS 9 Scaligera, Verona, Italy.
Marcello TucciMedical Oncology Unit, Regional Hospital of Aosta, Aosta, Italy.
Roberto BortolusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, NCI CRO Aviano, Aviano, Italy.
Marco MuraroDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, AULSS 9 Scaligera, Verona, Italy.
Giulia RinaldiDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, AULSS 9 Scaligera, Verona, Italy.
Nicoletta LucaDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, AULSS 9 Scaligera, Verona, Italy.
Francesco FioricaDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, AULSS 9 Scaligera, Verona, Italy. francesco.fiorica@aulss9.veneto.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9404-3655
University of Verona · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITCentro di Riferimento Oncologico · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewDetermining the risk for progression or survival after standard androgen deprivation treatment (ADT) in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) is essential for stratifying patients according to expected outcomes in future studies of treatment combination. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to estimate the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) probabilities in the control group of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of different regimens of standard androgen deprivation treatment (ADT) in mHSPC and to identify possible predictors of outcomes. RECENT

findingsStudies reporting time-dependent outcomes (progression or death) after standard ADT treatment of mHSPC were searched in MEDLINE, CANCERLIT, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and the Cochrane Library from inception through June 2021. Data on patient populations and outcomes were extracted from each study by three independent observers and combined using a distribution-free summary survival curve. Primary outcomes were actuarial probabilities of disease progression and survival. Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled estimate of the actuarial PFS rate was 35.2% at two years. The pooled actuarial OS rate was 62.5% at three years. Heterogeneity among studies was highly significant for all outcomes. By univariate meta-regression analyses, high-volume disease and the presence of visceral metastases were associated with shorter survival. Our findings show that PFS and OS are highly variable in patients with mHSPC treated with ADT, providing a helpful benchmark for indirect comparisons of the benefits of the combination of chemotherapy and second-generation hormonotherapy.

Indexed as

Androgen AntagonistsProstatic NeoplasmsAndrogensControl GroupsHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAndrogen AntagonistsAndrogensDeprivation TherapyMetastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate CancermHSPC and ADT

Identifiers

PMID35953601
OpenAlexW4299526258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.