Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35953597›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2022

Persistence, adherence, healthcare resource utilization and costs for ocrelizumab in the real-world of the Campania Region of Italy.

Marcello Moccia, Giuseppina Affinito, Giulia Berera, Giuseppina Marrazzo, Raffaele Piscitelli, Antonio Carotenuto, Maria Petracca, Roberta Lanzillo, Maria Triassi, Vincenzo Brescia Morra and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of COVID-19 and system recovery in delivering healthcare to people with multiple sclerosis: a population-based Study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcello MocciaMultiple Sclerosis Clinical Care and Research Centre, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy. marcello.moccia@unina.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2613-3090
Giuseppina AffinitoDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Giulia BereraROCHE Spa, Viale GB Stucchi 110, 20900, Monza, MB, Italy.
Giuseppina MarrazzoROCHE Spa, Viale GB Stucchi 110, 20900, Monza, MB, Italy.
Raffaele PiscitelliHospital Pharmacy ASL NA1 Centro, Naples, Italy.
Antonio CarotenutoMultiple Sclerosis Clinical Care and Research Centre, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Maria PetraccaMultiple Sclerosis Clinical Care and Research Centre, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Roberta LanzilloMultiple Sclerosis Clinical Care and Research Centre, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Maria TriassiDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Vincenzo Brescia MorraMultiple Sclerosis Clinical Care and Research Centre, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Raffaele PalladinoDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
University of Naples Federico II · ITRoche (Italy) · ITCTO Hospital · ITImperial College London · GB

Funding

Roche 2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsWe aim to provide real-world evidence on the use of ocrelizumab for treating multiple sclerosis (MS), with specific regard to prescription pattern, adherence, persistence, healthcare resource utilization and related costs, also in relation to other disease-modifying treatments (DMTs).

methodsWe included 2495 people with MS from the Campania Region (South Italy) who received first or switch DMT prescription from Jan 2018 to Dec 2020, and with at least 6-month follow-up. We collected hospital discharge records, drug prescriptions, and related costs, and calculated persistence (time from first prescription to discontinuation or switch to other DMT), adherence (proportion of days covered (PDC)), annualized hospitalization rate (AHR) for MS-related hospital admissions, and DMT costs.

resultsOcrelizumab was the most commonly prescribed DMT (n = 399; age = 45.74 ± 10.98 years; females = 224), after dimethyl fumarate (n = 588) and fingolimod (n = 401); 26% patients treated with ocrelizumab were naïve. When compared with ocrelizumab, the risk of discontinuation was higher for other highly active DMTs (HR = 3.78; p = 0.01), and low/medium efficacy DMTs (HR = 7.59; p < 0.01). When compared with ocrelizumab, PDC was similar to other highly active DMTs (Coeff = 0.01; p = 0.31), but higher for low/medium efficacy DMTs (Coeff = 0.09; p < 0.01). When compared with ocrelizumab, AHR was similar to other highly active DMTs (Coeff = 0.01; p = 0.51), and low/medium efficacy DMTs (Coeff = 0.01; p = 0.55). When compared with ocrelizumab, DMT monthly costs were higher for other highly active DMTs (Coeff = 92.30; p < 0.01), but lower for low/medium efficacy DMTs (Coeff = - 1043.61; p < 0.01). DISCUSSION: Ocrelizumab was among the most frequently prescribed DMTs, with 26% prescriptions to treatment-naïve patients, suggesting its relevance in addressing unmet clinical needs (e.g., first approved treatment for primary progressive MS). Ocrelizumab was associated with the highest persistence, confirming its favorable benefit-risk profile. Costs for ocrelizumab were lower than those associated to similarly effective DMTs, in absence of changes in healthcare resource utilization.

Indexed as

Fingolimod HydrochlorideMultiple SclerosisAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDimethyl FumarateFemaleHumansMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDimethyl FumarateFingolimod HydrochlorideocrelizumabCostsMultiple sclerosisOcrelizumabPersistence, adherenceTreatment

Identifiers

PMID35953597
PMCPMC9618479
OpenAlexW4292865401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.