Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35953594›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2022

Extrachromosomal DNA amplifications in cancer.

Eunhee Yi, Rocío Chamorro González, Anton G Henssen, Roel G W Verhaak

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Single-cell epigenomics of colorectal cancer.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Eunhee Yi *The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7839-7795
Rocío Chamorro González *Department of Paediatric Oncology/Hematology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5653-7259
Anton G HenssenDepartment of Paediatric Oncology/Hematology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. anton.henssen@charite.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1534-778X
Roel G W VerhaakThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA. roel.verhaak@jax.org.ORCID 0000-0003-2773-0436
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLGerman Cancer Research Center · DEJackson Laboratory · USMax Delbrück Center · DE

Funding

Shared Resource ManagementP30CA034196 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI Jeffrey Hsu-Min Chuang · 1985 to 2026
$61.9M
Extrachromosomal DNA as a Targetable Mechanism in GlioblastomaR01CA237208 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI VERHAAK, ROEL GW · 2020 to 2024
$2.5M
eDyNAmiC - YALEOT2CA278649 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Roel GW Verhaak · 2022 to 2026
$1.6M
Advancing Ultra Long-read Sequencing and Chromatin Interaction Analyses for Chromosomal and Extrachromosomal Structural Variation Characterization in CancerR33CA236681 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI VERHAAK, ROEL GW, WEI, CHIA-LIN · 2020 to 2020
$1.4M
Modeling Tumor Evolution in GliomaR21NS114873 · NINDS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI VERHAAK, ROEL GW · 2019 to 2020
$520k
Characterization of extrachromosomal DNAs in tumors through computational analysis of single-cell and bulk sequencing dataR21CA256575 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI VERHAAK, ROEL GW · 2021 to 2021
$478k
Cancer Research UK CGCATF-2021/100012NCI NIH HHS OT2 CA278649NCI NIH HHS P30 CA034196NCI NIH HHS R01 CA237208NCI NIH HHS R21 CA256575NCI NIH HHS R33 CA236681NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS114873
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) amplification is an important driver alteration in cancer. It has been observed in most cancer types and is associated with worse patient outcome. The functional impact of ecDNA has been linked to its unique properties, such as its circular structure that is associated with altered chromatinization and epigenetic regulatory landscape, as well as its ability to randomly segregate during cell division, which fuels intercellular copy number heterogeneity. Recent investigations suggest that ecDNA is structurally more complex than previously anticipated and that it localizes to specialized nuclear bodies (hubs) and can act in trans as an enhancer for genes on other ecDNAs or chromosomes. In this Review, we synthesize what is currently known about how ecDNA is generated and how its genetic and epigenetic architecture affects proto-oncogene deregulation in cancer. We discuss how recently identified ecDNA functions may impact oncogenesis but also serve as new therapeutic vulnerabilities in cancer.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsOncogenesChromosomesDNAHumansDNA

Identifiers

PMID35953594
PMCPMC9671848
OpenAlexW4292790981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.