Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35953551›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Performance of abbreviated protocols versus unenhanced MRI in detecting occult breast lesions of mammography in patients with dense breasts.

Peipei Chen, Guangrui Shao, Baijie Li, Huikun Zhang, Juan Xiao, Suhong Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peipei ChenDepartment of Radiology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, No. 247, Beiyuan Road, Tianqiao District, Jinan, 250033, Shandong, China.
Guangrui ShaoDepartment of Radiology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, No. 247, Beiyuan Road, Tianqiao District, Jinan, 250033, Shandong, China.
Baijie LiDepartment of Radiology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, No. 247, Beiyuan Road, Tianqiao District, Jinan, 250033, Shandong, China.
Huikun ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, No. 247, Beiyuan Road, Tianqiao District, Jinan, 250033, Shandong, China.
Juan XiaoCenter of Evidence-Based Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, No. 247, Beiyuan Road, Tianqiao District, Jinan, 250033, Shandong, China.
Suhong ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, No. 247, Beiyuan Road, Tianqiao District, Jinan, 250033, Shandong, China. jn8193303@163.com.
Second Hospital of Shandong University · CNShandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the diagnostic ability of abbreviated protocols of MRI (AP-MRI) compared with unenhanced MRI (UE-MRI) in mammographically occult cancers in patients with dense breast tissue. The retrospective analysis consisted of 102 patients without positive findings on mammography who received preoperative MRI full diagnostic protocols (FDP) between January 2015 and December 2018. Two breast radiologists read the UE, AP, and FDP. The interpretation times were recorded. The comparisons of the sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve of each MRI protocol, and the sensitivity of these protocols in each subgroup of different size tumors used the Chi-square test. The paired sample t-test was used for evaluating the difference of reading time of the three protocols. Among 102 women, there were 68 cancers and two benign lesions in 64 patients and 38 patients had benign or negative findings. Both readers found the sensitivity and specificity of AP and UE-MRI were similar (p > 0.05), whereas compared with FDP, UE had lower sensitivity (Reader 1/Reader 2: p = 0.023, 0.004). For different lesion size groups, one of the readers found that AP and FDP had higher sensitivities than UE-MRI for detecting the lesions ≤ 10 mm in diameter (p = 0.041, p = 0.023). Compared with FDP, the average reading time of UE-MRI and AP was remarkably reduced (p < 0.001). AP-MRI had more advantages than UE-MRI to detect mammographically occult cancers, especially for breast tumors ≤ 10 mm in diameter.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammographyBreast DensityFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID35953551
PMCPMC9372172
OpenAlexW4291608078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.