Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35953518›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2022

Genetics follow up after rapid genomic sequencing in intensive care: current practices and recommendations for service delivery.

Fiona Lynch, Amy Nisselle, Zornitza Stark, Clara L Gaff, Belinda McClaren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. 2022: the year that was in the European Journal of Human Genetics.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fiona LynchAustralian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6386-6739
Amy NisselleAustralian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8908-5906
Zornitza StarkAustralian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8640-1371
Clara L GaffAustralian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0160-4159
Belinda McClarenAustralian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. belinda.mcclaren@mcri.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1372-8258

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The delivery of rapid genomic sequencing (rGS) to critically unwell children in intensive care occurs at a time of immense pressure and stress for parents. Contact with families after result disclosure, particularly after hospital discharge, presents an opportunity to meet their psychological, medical and information needs as they evolve. This study explores the preferences and perspectives of health professionals and parents of genetics follow up after rGS. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 parents, seven genetic counsellors (GCs) and four intensive care physicians with experience in rGS. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Current practices surrounding genetics follow up after rGS were highly variable, resulting in some families not receiving the ongoing care they needed. Reasons identified by families for wanting follow-up care represented only a subset of those identified by health professionals. While GCs routinely provided their details to allow parents to initiate further contact, this was not always sufficient for follow-up care. Health professionals identified both organisational and psychosocial barriers to conducting follow up. As rGS transforms the diagnostic pathway in rare disease, there is a need for a co-designed, standardised but flexible model for follow-up care with genetics professionals so that families' evolving needs are met.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelParentsChildCritical CareFollow-Up StudiesGenomicsHumans

Identifiers

PMID35953518
PMCPMC9626620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.