ArticlePediatric research2023
Opitz syndrome: improving clinical interpretation of intronic variants in MID1 gene.
Article in Pediatric research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLoss-of-function variants in MID1 are the most common cause of Opitz G/BBB syndrome (OS). The interpretation of intronic variants affecting the splicing is a rising issue in OS.
methodsExon sequencing of a 2-year-old boy with OS showed that he was a carrier of the de novo c.1286-10G>T variant in MID1. In silico predictions and minigene assays explored the effect of the variant on splicing. The minigene approach was also applied to two previously identified MID1 c.864+1G>T and c.1285+1G>T variants.
resultsMinigene assay demonstrated that the c.1286-10G>T variant generated the inclusion of eight nucleotides that predicted generation of a frameshift. The c.864+1G>T and c.1285+1G>T variants resulted in an in-frame deletion predicted to generate a shorter MID1 protein. In hemizygous males, this allowed reclassification of all the identified variants from "of unknown significance" to "likely pathogenic."
conclusionsMinigene assay supports functional effects from MID1 intronic variants. This paves the way to the introduction of similar second-tier investigations in the molecular diagnostics workflow of OS. IMPACT: Causative intronic variants in MID1 are rarely investigated in Opitz syndrome. MID1 is not expressed in blood and mRNA studies are hardly accessible in routine diagnostics. Minigene assay is an alternative for assessing the effect of intronic variants on splicing. This is the first study characterizing the molecular consequences of three MID1 variants for diagnostic purposes and demonstrating the efficacy of minigene assays in supporting their clinical interpretation. Review of the criteria according to the American College of Medical Genetics reassessed all variants as likely pathogenic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.