Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35953502›Full record

ArticleNPJ vaccines2022

A Bayesian network analysis quantifying risks versus benefits of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in Australia.

Jane E Sinclair, Helen J Mayfield, Kirsty R Short, Samuel J Brown, Rajesh Puranik, Kerrie Mengersen, John C B Litt, Colleen L Lau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Being Bayesian in the 2020s: opportunities and challenges in the practice of modern applied Bayesian statistics.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jane E SinclairSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9178-3869
Helen J MayfieldSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Kirsty R ShortSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Samuel J BrownSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7542-8664
Rajesh PuranikDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Kerrie MengersenSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
John C B Litt *Discipline of General Practice, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3103-0064
Colleen L Lau *School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. colleen.lau@uq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8288-4169
The University of Queensland · AUQueensland University of Technology · AUFlinders University · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 1193826Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 2007919
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine is associated with increased myocarditis incidence. Constantly evolving evidence regarding incidence and case fatality of COVID-19 and myocarditis related to infection or vaccination, creates challenges for risk-benefit analysis of vaccination. Challenges are complicated further by emerging evidence of waning vaccine effectiveness, and variable effectiveness against variants. Here, we build on previous work on the COVID-19 Risk Calculator (CoRiCal) by integrating Australian and international data to inform a Bayesian network that calculates probabilities of outcomes for the delta variant under different scenarios of Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine coverage, age groups (≥12 years), sex, community transmission intensity and vaccine effectiveness. The model estimates that in a population where 5% were unvaccinated, 5% had one dose, 60% had two doses and 30% had three doses, there was a substantially greater probability of developing (239-5847 times) and dying (1430-384,684 times) from COVID-19-related than vaccine-associated myocarditis (depending on age and sex). For one million people with this vaccine coverage, where transmission intensity was equivalent to 10% chance of infection over 2 months, 68,813 symptomatic COVID-19 cases and 981 deaths would be prevented, with 42 and 16 expected cases of vaccine-associated myocarditis in males and females, respectively. These results justify vaccination in all age groups as vaccine-associated myocarditis is generally mild in the young, and there is unequivocal evidence for reduced mortality from COVID-19 in older individuals. The model may be updated to include emerging best evidence, data pertinent to different countries or vaccines and other outcomes such as long COVID.

Identifiers

PMID35953502
PMCPMC9371378
OpenAlexW4293298552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.