Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35953420›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical education

Understanding General Surgery Applicant Expectations and Perceptions in the Virtual Interview Process.

Jessie W Ho, Rachel H Joung, Mackenzie Krueger, Christina Cid, Amy L Holmstrom, Cary Jo R Schlick, Leah C Tatebe, Hasan B Alam, Amy L Halverson, Derrick A Christopher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical education. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jessie W HoDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: Jessie.ho@nm.org.
Rachel H JoungDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Mackenzie KruegerDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Christina CidDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Amy L HolmstromDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Cary Jo R SchlickDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Leah C TatebeDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Hasan B AlamDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Amy L HalversonDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Derrick A ChristopherDepartment of Surgery, Division of Organ Transplantation, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

Vascular Surgery Scientist Training ProgramT32HL094293 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ESKANDARI, MARK K · 2009 to 2023
$4.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL094293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe COVID-19 pandemic has played a lasting role on residency recruitment through the virtual interview process. The objective of this study was to 1) examine general surgery applicants' priorities and perceptions following pre-interview virtual open houses and 2) to assess applicant expectations and efficacy of the virtual interview day process. DESIGN/SETTING/

participantsThis study utilized two voluntary and anonymous cross-sectional surveys administered via email to evaluate the virtual interview process of a general surgery residency program. The first was administered to registrants following completion of three open houses of various topics. The second was administered following each interview day. The post-open house survey had 78 respondents, two excluded for no open house attendance. The post-interview survey was completed by 44 applicants (62.9% response rate).

resultsMajority of respondents reported that attending virtual open houses made them want to apply to (90.9%) and improved their perception of the program (94.7%). Applicants who felt a sense of obligation to attend open houses (68.4%) were significantly more likely to feel that they contributed to the stress and time commitment of applications (81.8% vs 18.2%, p=0.028). Interview expectations were identified in recurrent themes: 1. Clear organization with breaks, 2. Interactive resident sessions, 3. Meetings with program leadership, 4. Additional information unavailable on other resources. The pre-interview social and interview day improved 90.2% of the applicants' perceptions of the program. The interview significantly improved applicants' ability to assess nearly all aspects of the program, notably resident camaraderie and culture (30.8% vs 97.4%, p=0.01) and strengths and weaknesses (30.8% vs 92.3%, p=0.04).

conclusionsWhile virtual open houses can improve applicants' perceptions and desire to apply to a program, the associated stress and obligation should be considered. Virtual interviews should provide information unavailable using other resources and provide avenues for conveying the resident culture and camaraderie.

Indexed as

COVID-19Internship and ResidencyCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMotivationPandemicsgeneral surgeryresidencyresidency applicationVirtual interviewsvirtual open house

Identifiers

PMID35953420
PMCPMC9359908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.