ReviewHearing research2022
Underlying neural mechanisms of degraded speech intelligibility following noise-induced hearing loss: The importance of distorted tonotopy.
Review in Hearing research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Speech-in-noise discriminability after noise exposure: Insights from a gerbil model of acoustic trauma.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Impact of reduced spectral resolution on temporal-coherence-based source segregation.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- The impact of noise-induced hearing loss on individual job performance: exploring the role of aggression and work-related quality of life.BMC psychology · 2024Article
- Article
- Impact of Reduced Spectral Resolution on Temporal-Coherence-Based Source Segregation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- The perception of ultrasonic vocalizations by laboratory mice following intense noise exposures.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- Altered neural encoding of vowels in noise does not affect behavioral vowel discrimination in gerbils with age-related hearing loss.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Listeners with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) have substantial perceptual deficits, especially in noisy environments. Unfortunately, speech-intelligibility models have limited success in predicting the performance of listeners with hearing loss. A better understanding of the various suprathreshold factors that contribute to neural-coding degradations of speech in noisy conditions will facilitate better modeling and clinical outcomes. Here, we highlight the importance of one physiological factor that has received minimal attention to date, termed distorted tonotopy, which refers to a disruption in the mapping between acoustic frequency and cochlear place that is a hallmark of normal hearing. More so than commonly assumed factors (e.g., threshold elevation, reduced frequency selectivity, diminished temporal coding), distorted tonotopy severely degrades the neural representations of speech (particularly in noise) in single- and across-fiber responses in the auditory nerve following noise-induced hearing loss. Key results include: 1) effects of distorted tonotopy depend on stimulus spectral bandwidth and timbre, 2) distorted tonotopy increases across-fiber correlation and thus reduces information capacity to the brain, and 3) its effects vary across etiologies, which may contribute to individual differences. These results motivate the development and testing of noninvasive measures that can assess the severity of distorted tonotopy in human listeners. The development of such noninvasive measures of distorted tonotopy would advance precision-audiological approaches to improving diagnostics and rehabilitation for listeners with SNHL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.