ArticleJournal of pediatric surgery2022
Seven-day in vivo testing of a novel, low-resistance, pumpless pediatric artificial lung for long-term support.
Article in Journal of pediatric surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionFor children with end-stage lung disease that cannot wean from extracorporeal life support (ECLS), a wearable artificial lung would permit extubation and provide a bridge to recovery or transplantation. We evaluate the function of the novel Pediatric MLung-a low-resistance, pumpless artificial lung developed specifically for children-in healthy animal subjects.
methodsAdolescent "mini sheep" weighing 12-20 kg underwent left thoracotomy, cannulation of the main pulmonary artery (PA; inflow) and left atrium (outflow), and connection to the MLung.
resultsThirteen sheep were studied; 6 were supported for 7 days. Mean PA pressure was 23.9 ± 6.9 mmHg. MLung blood flow was 633±258 mL/min or 30.0 ± 16.0% of CO. MLung pressure drop was 4.4 ± 3.4 mmHg. Resistance was 7.2 ± 5.2 mmHg/L/min. Device outlet oxygen saturation was 99.0 ± 3.3% with inlet saturation 53.8 ± 7.3%. Oxygen delivery was 41.1 ± 18.4 mL O
conclusionThe MLung provides adequate gas exchange at appropriate blood flows for the pediatric population in a PA-to-LA configuration. Further work remains to improve the biocompatibility of the device. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.