Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35953252›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Fragmentation of ambulatory care among older adults: an exhaustive database study in an ageing city in Japan.

Makoto Kaneko, Satoru Shinoda, Sayuri Shimizu, Makoto Kuroki, Sachiko Nakagami, Taiga Chiba, Atsushi Goto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Makoto KanekoDepartment of Health Data Science, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan kanekom@yokohama-cu.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-4581-8274
Satoru ShinodaDepartment of Health Data Science, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Sayuri ShimizuDepartment of Health Data Science, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Makoto KurokiDepartment of Health Data Science, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Sachiko NakagamiMedical Policy Division, Medical Care Bureau, City of Yokohama, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Taiga ChibaMedical Policy Division, Medical Care Bureau, City of Yokohama, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Atsushi GotoDepartment of Health Data Science, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0669-654X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesContinuity of care is a core dimension of primary care, and better continuity is associated with better patient outcomes. Therefore, care fragmentation can be an indicator to assess the quality of primary care, especially in countries without formal gatekeeping system, such as Japan. Thus, this study aimed to describe care fragmentation among older adults in an ageing city in Japan.

designCross-sectional study.

settingThe most populated basic municipality in Japan.

participantsOlder adults aged 75 years and older.

interventionsThis study used a health claims database, including older adults who visited medical facilities at least four times a year in an urban city in Japan. The Fragmentation of Care Index (FCI) was used as an indicator of fragmentation. The FCI was developed from the Continuity of Care Index and is based on the total number of visits, different institutions visited and proportion of visits to each institution. We employed Tobit regression analysis to examine the association between the FCI and age, sex, type of insurance and most frequently visited facility.

resultsThe total number of participants was 413 600. The median age of the study population was 81 years, and 41.6% were men. The study population visited an average of 3.42 clinics/hospitals, and the maximum number of visited institutions was 20. The proportion of patients with FCI >0 was 85.0%, with a mean of 0.583. Multivariable analysis showed that patients receiving public assistance had a lower FCI compared with patients not receiving public assistance, with a coefficient of 0.137.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate care fragmentation in Japan. Over 80% of the participants visited two or more medical facilities, and their mean FCI was 0.583. The FCI could be a basic indicator for assessing the quality of primary care.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareAgedAged, 80 and overCitiesCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansJapanMalePopulation Dynamicsgeriatric medicinehealth policyprimary carepublic health

Identifiers

PMID35953252
PMCPMC9379480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.