Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35952707›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Oncology2022

De-escalation of radiotherapy after primary chemotherapy in cT1-2N1 breast cancer (RAPCHEM; BOOG 2010-03): 5-year follow-up results of a Dutch, prospective, registry study.

Sabine R de Wild, Linda de Munck, Janine M Simons, Janneke Verloop, Thijs van Dalen, Paula H M Elkhuizen, Ruud M A Houben, A Elise van Leeuwen, Sabine C Linn, Ruud M Pijnappel and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01279304 (Radiotherapy After Primary CHEMotherapy for cT1-2cN1M0 Breast Cancer.), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01279304 completednot on this map

Radiotherapy After Primary CHEMotherapy for cT1-2cN1M0 Breast Cancer.: a Multicentre Prospective Registration Study.

TypeobservationalSponsorMaastricht Radiation OncologyRan2011 to 2017Enrolled851ConditionsBreast CancerArmsradiation - no radiation see intervention description, radiation: see intervention description
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. DEGRO practical guidelines: radiotherapy of breast cancer-regional nodal irradiation.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Author's reply to Rao et al.-"DEGRO practical guidelines: radiotherapy of breast cancer-regional nodal irradiation".Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Axillary management in patients with cN + breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: pattern of practice in Italy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sabine R de WildDepartment of Surgery, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands. Electronic address: s.dewild@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Linda de MunckDepartment of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Janine M SimonsDepartment of Surgery, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands; Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Janneke VerloopDepartment of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Thijs van DalenDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Paula H M ElkhuizenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Ruud M A HoubenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
A Elise van LeeuwenDutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Sabine C LinnDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Ruud M PijnappelDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Netherlands.
Philip M P PoortmansDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Luc J A StrobbeDepartment of Surgery, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Jelle WesselingDepartment of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Adri C VoogdDepartment of Epidemiology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands; Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, Netherlands; CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Liesbeth J BoersmaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary chemotherapy in breast cancer poses a dilemma with regard to adjuvant locoregional radiotherapy, as guidelines for locoregional radiotherapy were originally based on pathology results of primary surgery. We aimed to evaluate the oncological safety of de-escalated locoregional radiotherapy in patients with cT1-2N1 breast cancer treated with primary chemotherapy, according to a predefined, consensus-based study guideline.

methodsIn this prospective registry study (RAPCHEM, BOOG 2010-03), patients referred to one of 17 participating radiation oncology centres in the Netherlands between Jan 1, 2011, and Jan 1, 2015, with cT1-2N1 breast cancer (one to three suspicious nodes on imaging before primary chemotherapy, of which at least one had been pathologically confirmed), and who were treated with primary chemotherapy and surgery of the breast and axilla were included in the study. The study guideline comprised three risk groups for locoregional recurrence, with corresponding locoregional radiotherapy recommendations: no chest wall radiotherapy and no regional radiotherapy in the low-risk group, only local radiotherapy in the intermediate-risk group, and locoregional radiotherapy in the high-risk group. Radiotherapy consisted of a biologically equivalent dose of 25 fractions of 2 Gy, with or without a boost. During the study period, the generally applied radiotherapy technique in the Netherlands was forward-planned or inverse-planned intensity modulated radiotherapy. 5-year follow-up was assessed, taking into account adherence to the study guideline, with locoregional recurrence rate as primary endpoint. We hypothesised that 5-year locoregional recurrence rate would be less than 4% (upper-limit 95% CI 7·8%). This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01279304, and is completed.

findings838 patients were eligible for 5-year follow-up analyses: 291 in the low-risk group, 370 in the intermediate-risk group, and 177 in the high-risk group. The 5-year locoregional recurrence rate in all patients was 2·2% (95% CI 1·4-3·4). The 5-year locoregional recurrence rate was 2·1% (0·9-4·3) in the low-risk group, 2·2% (1·0-4·1) in the intermediate-risk group, and 2·3% (0·8-5·5) in the high-risk group. If the study guideline was followed, the locoregional recurrence rate was 2·3% (0·8-5·3) for the low-risk group, 1·0% (0·2-3·4) for the intermediate-risk group, and 1·4% (0·3-4·5) for the high-risk group.

interpretationIn this study, the 5-year locoregional recurrence rate was less than 4%, which supports our hypothesis that it is oncologically safe to de-escalate locoregional radiotherapy based on locoregional recurrence risk, in selected patients with cT1-2N1 breast cancer treated with primary chemotherapy, according to this predefined, consensus-based study guideline.

fundingDutch Cancer Society. TRANSLATION: For the Dutch translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsRadiation OncologyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMastectomyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRegistries

Identifiers

PMID35952707
OpenAlexW4293861017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.