Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35952602›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2022

High resolution parallel sequencing reveals multistrain Campylobacter in broiler chicken flocks testing 'negative' by conventional culture methods: implications for control of Campylobacter infection.

Frances M Colles, Daniela Karasova, Magdalena Crhanova, Stephen G Preston, Adrian L Smith, Marian S Dawkins, Ivan Rychlik, Sabine G Gebhardt-Henrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Clonal Spread and Persistence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Frances M CollesDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3RE UK. Electronic address: frances.colles@zoo.ox.ac.uk.
Daniela KarasovaVeterinary Research Institute, 621 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Magdalena CrhanovaVeterinary Research Institute, 621 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Stephen G PrestonDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3RE UK.
Adrian L SmithDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3RE UK.
Marian S DawkinsDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3RE UK.
Ivan RychlikVeterinary Research Institute, 621 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Sabine G Gebhardt-HenrichUniversity of Bern, Center for Proper Housing: Poultry and Rabbits, Division of Animal Welfare, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contaminated chicken meat is a major source of human Campylobacteriosis and rates of infection remain high, despite efforts to limit the colonisation of broiler (meat) chicken flocks on farms. Using conventional testing methods of culture or qPCR, Campylobacter is typically detected amongst broiler flocks from 3 wk of age, leading to the assumption that infection is introduced horizontally into chicken rearing houses at this time. In this study, we use parallel sequencing of a fragment of the Campylobacter outer membrane protein, encoded by the porA gene, to test for presence of Campylobacter DNA amongst fresh fecal samples collected from broiler flocks aged 23 to 28 d. Campylobacter DNA was detected in all of the 290 samples tested using the porA target, and in 48% of samples using 16S bacterial profiling, irrespective of whether or not Campylobacter could be detected using conventional qPCR thresholds. A single porAf2 variant was predominant among flocks that would be determined to be Campylobacter 'positive' by conventional means, but a diverse pattern was seen among flocks that were Campylobacter 'negative'. The ability to routinely detect low levels of Campylobacter amongst broiler flocks at a much earlier age than would conventionally be identified requires a re-examination of how and when biosecurity measures are best applied for live birds. In addition, it may be useful to investigate why single Campylobacter variants proliferate in some broiler flocks and not others.

Indexed as

CampylobacterCampylobacter InfectionsPoultry DiseasesAnimalsChickensMembrane ProteinsMembrane Proteinsbroilercampylobactermultistrainparallel sequencing

Identifiers

PMID35952602
PMCPMC9372630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.