Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35951619›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Language production impairments in patients with a first episode of psychosis.

Giulia Gargano, Elisabetta Caletti, Cinzia Perlini, Nunzio Turtulici, Marcella Bellani, Carolina Bonivento, Marco Garzitto, Francesca Marzia Siri, Chiara Longo, Chiara Bonetto and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Giulia GarganoDepartment of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4043-5661
Elisabetta CalettiDepartment of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Cinzia PerliniDepartment of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Nunzio TurtuliciDepartment of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Marcella BellaniDepartment of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Carolina BoniventoIRCCS "E.Medea" Polo Friuli Venezia Giulia, San Vito al Tagliamento, PN, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3354-7494
Marco GarzittoDepartment of Languages and Literatures, Communication, Education and Society, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7565-420X
Francesca Marzia SiriDepartment of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Chiara LongoDepartment of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Chiara BonettoDepartment of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Doriana CristofaloDepartment of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Paolo ScoccoDepartment of Mental Health, Azienda ULSS 16, Padua, Italy.
Enrico SemrovDepartment of Mental Health, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Antonio PretiDepartment of Mental Health, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Lorenza LazzarottoDepartment of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Francesco GardellinDepartment of Mental Health, Azienda Ulss 8 Berica, Vicenza, Italy.
Antonio LasalviaDepartment of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Mirella RuggeriDepartment of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Andrea MariniDepartment of Languages and Literatures, Communication, Education and Society, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6058-3864
Paolo BrambillaDepartment of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
GET UP Group
University of Verona · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITUniversity of Milan · ITAULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana · ITUniversity of Udine · ITAzienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITIRCCS Eugenio Medea · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Language production has often been described as impaired in psychiatric diseases such as in psychosis. Nevertheless, little is known about the characteristics of linguistic difficulties and their relation with other cognitive domains in patients with a first episode of psychosis (FEP), either affective or non-affective. To deepen our comprehension of linguistic profile in FEP, 133 patients with FEP (95 non-affective, FEP-NA; 38 affective, FEP-A) and 133 healthy controls (HC) were assessed with a narrative discourse task. Speech samples were systematically analyzed with a well-established multilevel procedure investigating both micro- (lexicon, morphology, syntax) and macro-linguistic (discourse coherence, pragmatics) levels of linguistic processing. Executive functioning and IQ were also evaluated. Both linguistic and neuropsychological measures were secondarily implemented with a machine learning approach in order to explore their predictive accuracy in classifying participants as FEP or HC. Compared to HC, FEP patients showed language production difficulty at both micro- and macro-linguistic levels. As for the former, FEP produced shorter and simpler sentences and fewer words per minute, along with a reduced number of lexical fillers, compared to HC. At the macro-linguistic level, FEP performance was impaired in local coherence, which was paired with a higher percentage of utterances with semantic errors. Linguistic measures were not correlated with any neuropsychological variables. No significant differences emerged between FEP-NA and FEP-A (p≥0.02, after Bonferroni correction). Machine learning analysis showed an accuracy of group prediction of 76.36% using language features only, with semantic variables being the most impactful. Such a percentage was enhanced when paired with clinical and neuropsychological variables. Results confirm the presence of language production deficits already at the first episode of the illness, being such impairment not related to other cognitive domains. The high accuracy obtained by the linguistic set of features in classifying groups support the use of machine learning methods in neuroscience investigations.

Indexed as

Language DisordersPsychotic DisordersComprehensionHumansLanguageNeuropsychological Tests

Identifiers

PMID35951619
PMCPMC9371299
OpenAlexW4290950996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.