Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35951500›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Accessing the stapedius muscle via novel surgical retrofacial approach during cochlear implantation surgery: Intraoperative results on feasibility and safety.

Orlando Guntinas-Lichius, Dirk Arnold, Gerd Fabian Volk, Daniela Korth, Rene Aschenbach, Johann-Martin Hempel, Fritz Schneider, Thore Schade-Mann, Philipp Gamerdinger, Anke Tropitzsch and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Cochlear implantation through retro-facial approach with congenital microtia malformation with facial nerve deformity: a case report].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Orlando Guntinas-LichiusDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9671-0784
Dirk ArnoldDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Gerd Fabian VolkDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Daniela KorthDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Rene AschenbachDepartment of Radiology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Johann-Martin HempelDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Tübingen Medical Center, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9647-5136
Fritz SchneiderDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Hearing Research Center, University of Tübingen Medical Center, Tübingen, Germany.
Thore Schade-MannDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Hearing Research Center, University of Tübingen Medical Center, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4724-2440
Philipp GamerdingerDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Hearing Research Center, University of Tübingen Medical Center, Tübingen, Germany.
Anke TropitzschDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Hearing Research Center, University of Tübingen Medical Center, Tübingen, Germany.
Hubert LöwenheimDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Hearing Research Center, University of Tübingen Medical Center, Tübingen, Germany.
University of Tübingen · DEJena University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human stapedius muscle (SM) can be directly and safely accessed via retrofacial approach, opening new approaches to directly measure the electrically evoked stapedius reflex threshold (eSRT). The measurement of the SM activity via direct surgical access represents a potential tool for objective eSRT fitting of cochlear implants (CI), increasing the benefit experienced by the CI users and leading to new perspectives in the development of smart implantable neurostimulators. 3D middle-ear reconstructions created after manual segmentation and related SM accessibility metrics were evaluated before the CI surgery for 16 candidates with assessed stapedius reflex. Retrofacial approach to access the SM was performed after facial recess exposure. In cases of poor exposition of SM, the access was performed anteriorly to the FN via drilling of the pyramidal eminence (PE). The total access rate of the SM via both the retrofacial and anterior approach of the FN was 100%. In 81.2% of cases (13/16), the retrofacial approach allowed to access the SM on previously categorized well exposed (8/8), partially exposed (4/5), and wholly concealed (1/3) SM with respect to FN. Following intraoperative evaluation in the remaining 18.8% (3/16), the SM was accessed anteriorly via drilling of the PE. Exposure of SM with respect to the FN and the sigmoid sinus's prominence was a predictor for the suitable surgical approach. The retrofacial approach offers feasible and reproducible access to the SM belly, opening direct access to electromyographic sensing of the eSRT. Surgical planner tools can quantitatively assist pre-surgical assessment.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsElectric StimulationFeasibility StudiesHumansReflex, AcousticStapedius

Identifiers

PMID35951500
PMCPMC9371293
OpenAlexW4291021062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.