Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35951391›Full record

ArticlePsychological services2023

Barriers to and facilitators of using evidence-based, cognitive-behavioral anxiety interventions in integrated primary care practice.

Robyn L Shepardson, Terri L Fletcher, Jennifer S Funderburk, Risa B Weisberg, Gregory P Beehler, Stephen A Maisto

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological services, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Robyn L ShepardsonCenter for Integrated Healthcare, Syracuse VA Medical Center.ORCID 0000-0001-6954-5920
Terri L FletcherVA Health Services Research and Development Houston Center of Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center.
Jennifer S FunderburkCenter for Integrated Healthcare, Syracuse VA Medical Center.
Risa B WeisbergVA Boston Healthcare System.
Gregory P BeehlerCenter for Integrated Healthcare, VA Western New York Healthcare System.
Stephen A MaistoCenter for Integrated Healthcare, Syracuse VA Medical Center.
SUNY Upstate Medical University · USMichael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center · USVA Boston Healthcare System · USVA Western New York Healthcare System · US

Funding

Improving Primary Care Anxiety Treatment Engagement and EffectivenessIK2HX002107 · VA · SYRACUSE VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SHEPARDSON, ROBYN LEANNE · 2018 to 2021
–
HSRD VA IK2 HX002107US Department of Veterans Affairs; Veterans Health Administration; Health Services Research and Development Service
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive-behavioral treatment for anxiety disorders and symptoms remains underutilized in integrated primary care (IPC), in part because the many treatments developed for specialty care are not readily translated to this unique setting. The objective of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators to behavioral health providers (BHPs) delivering evidence-based cognitive--behavioral anxiety interventions within IPC practice. We conducted semistructured interviews with a national sample of 18 BHPs (50% psychologists, 33% social workers, 17% registered nurses) working in IPC in the Veterans Health Administration. We assessed barriers to and facilitators of using psychoeducation, exposure, cognitive therapy, relaxation training, mindfulness/meditation, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-based interventions, and problem-solving therapy. Qualitative coding and conventional content analysis revealed barriers and facilitators at three levels: IPC, provider, and patient. Themes suggested key barriers of poor fit with the IPC model, BHP training deficits, and lack of patient buy-in, and key facilitators of good perceived fit of the intervention (e.g., scope, duration) with the IPC model, BHPs feeling well equipped, and utility for patients. BHPs select interventions based on fit for the individual patient. Some results were consistent with prior work from specialty care, but the IPC model itself introduces significant implementation challenges. BHPs would benefit from flexible intervention options and training on IPC treatment goals and how to deliver the essence of evidence-based interventions in small doses. Our findings will help to inform adaptation of behavioral anxiety interventions to better fit IPC practice and development of beneficial training and resources for BHPs to reduce implementation challenges. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Acceptance and Commitment TherapyAnxietyAnxiety DisordersBridged Bicyclo CompoundsCognitionHumansPrimary Health Carebicyclo(2.2.1)hept-5-en-2-yl phenyl sulfoxideBridged Bicyclo Compounds

Identifiers

PMID35951391
PMCPMC10166237
OpenAlexW4290804324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.