Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35951124›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2022

Efficacy of Er:YAG laser for the peri-implantitis treatment and microbiological changes: a randomized controlled trial.

Jen-Hao Chen, Ying-Chun Lin, Jung-Chang Kung, Dah-You Yan, I-Hui Chen, You-Syun Jheng, Chern-Hsiung Lai, Yi-Min Wu, Kun-Tsung Lee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jen-Hao ChenDivision of Prosthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, 807378, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2161-2623
Ying-Chun LinDepartment of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, 807378, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6605-0906
Jung-Chang KungSchool of Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807378, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8188-0470
Dah-You YanDivision of Periodontics, Department of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, 807378, Taiwan.
I-Hui ChenDivision of Periodontics, Department of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, 807378, Taiwan.
You-Syun JhengCollege of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 110301, Taiwan.
Chern-Hsiung LaiSchool of Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807378, Taiwan.
Yi-Min WuDivision of Clinical Dentistry, Department of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, No.100, Tzyou 1st Road, Kaohsiung, 807378, Taiwan.
Kun-Tsung LeeDepartment of Oral Hygiene, College of Dental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807378, Taiwan. denzelle@kmu.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8818-3822
Kaohsiung Medical University · TWTaipei Medical University · TW

Funding

Southern Taiwan Science Park BX-04-11-21-106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aims of this study were to identify the microbiological changes in the periodontal pockets following an Er:YAG laser (ERL) irradiation and mechanical debridement to compare the effectiveness of ERL irradiation to mechanical debridement for peri-implantitis treatment through randomized controlled trials. Twenty-three patients with peri-implantitis lesions were treated in either a test group, ERL set at energy level of 100 mJ/pulse, frequency of 10 Hz, pulse duration was 100 µs, and irradiated by three passages, or a control group, with mechanical debridement using an ultrasonic scaler. An examiner measured the following clinical parameters at different stages (a baseline and at 3- and 6-month post-treatment): probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), marginal bone loss (MBL), and anaerobic bacteria counts. Linear regression, with generalized estimation equations, was used to compare the clinical parameters and anaerobic bacterial counts at different stages and between groups. The anaerobic bacterial counts significantly decreased within the control group during the follow-ups. At the 6-month follow-up, both groups showed a significant reduction in PD (test group: mean difference of 0.84 mm; control group: mean difference of 0.41 mm), and the test group showed a significantly higher PD reduction on the buccal site (1.31 mm) compared to that of the control group (0.25 mm). Both ERL and mechanical debridement treatments led to significant improvements in PD. When mechanical debridement therapy was used, significant anaerobic bacterial count reductions were observed. Future treatment of peri-implantitis should involve a combination of both of these therapies.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsLasers, Solid-StatePeri-ImplantitisBacterial LoadDebridementHumansPeriodontal PocketRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeDental ImplantsAnaerobic bacteriaClinical trialDental implantLaser therapyMechanical debridementPeri-implantitis treatment

Identifiers

PMID35951124
OpenAlexW4291006589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.