ArticleBiological cybernetics2022
Optimum trajectory learning in musculoskeletal systems with model predictive control and deep reinforcement learning.
Article in Biological cybernetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wearable Sensors and Artificial Intelligence for Ecological Knee Osteoarthritis Assessment: Development and Feasibility of a Hybrid Digital Phenotyping Framework.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bond graph analysis of a three-link physiological motor control system: integrating simulation and muscle behavior.Biological cybernetics · 2025Article
- Innovative Digital Phenotyping Method to Assess Body Representations in Autistic Adults: A Perspective on Multisensor Evaluation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Neuromechanics-Based Neural Feedback Controller for Planar Arm Reaching Movements.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Generating Human Arm Kinematics Using Reinforcement Learning to Train Active Muscle Behavior in Automotive Research.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
From the computational point of view, musculoskeletal control is the problem of controlling high degrees of freedom and dynamic multi-body system that is driven by redundant muscle units. A critical challenge in the control perspective of skeletal joints with antagonistic muscle pairs is finding methods robust to address this ill-posed nonlinear problem. To address this computational problem, we implemented a twofold optimization and learning framework to be specialized in addressing the redundancies in the muscle control . In the first part, we used model predictive control to obtain energy efficient skeletal trajectories to mimick human movements. The second part is to use deep reinforcement learning to obtain a sequence of stimulus to be given to muscles in order to obtain the skeletal trajectories with muscle control. We observed that the desired stimulus to muscles is only efficiently constructed by integrating the state and control input in a closed-loop setting as it resembles the proprioceptive integration in the spinal cord circuits. In this work, we showed how a variety of different reference trajectories can be obtained with optimal control and how these reference trajectories are mapped to the musculoskeletal control with deep reinforcement learning. Starting from the characteristics of human arm movement to obstacle avoidance experiment, our simulation results confirm the capabilities of our optimization and learning framework for a variety of dynamic movement trajectories. In summary, the proposed framework is offering a pipeline to complement the lack of experiments to record human motion-capture data as well as study the activation range of muscles to replicate the specific trajectory of interest. Using the trajectories from optimal control as a reference signal for reinforcement learning implementation has allowed us to acquire optimum and human-like behaviour of the musculoskeletal system which provides a framework to study human movement in-silico experiments. The present framework can also allow studying upper-arm rehabilitation with assistive robots given that one can use healthy subject movement recordings as reference to work on the control architecture of assistive robotics in order to compensate behavioural deficiencies. Hence, the framework opens to possibility of replicating or complementing labour-intensive, time-consuming and costly experiments with human subjects in the field of movement studies and digital twin of rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.