Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35951098›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

A person-centred intervention remotely targeting family caregivers' support needs in the context of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation-a feasibility study.

Annika M Kisch, Karin Bergkvist, Sólveig Adalsteinsdóttir, Christel Wendt, Anette Alvariza, Jeanette Winterling

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Annika M KischDepartment of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. annika.kisch@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1536-3926
Karin BergkvistDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6331-8599
Sólveig AdalsteinsdóttirMedical Unit CAST, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5400-2085
Christel WendtDepartment of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1561-0843
Anette AlvarizaDepartment of Health Care Sciences, Palliative Research Centre, Marie Cederschiöld University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2711-0245
Jeanette WinterlingDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4165-9015
Karolinska University Hospital · SELund University · SEMarie Cederschiöld University · SESkåne University Hospital · SESophiahemmet University College · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAllogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an intensive curative treatment that increases family caregivers' burden. The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of remotely assessing and addressing family caregivers' support needs in terms of demand and acceptability using the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool Intervention (CSNAT-I) in the HSCT context.

methodsCSNAT-I consists of an evidence-based tool and a five-stage person-centred process. The intervention was performed remotely by two designated nurses from two HSCT centres, one before HSCT and the second 6 weeks after (November 2020 to March 2021). To capture the experiences of using CSNAT-I, interviews were conducted with family caregivers and reflections were gathered from the designated nurses.

resultsOf 34 eligible family caregivers, 27 participated, 70% were partners and the rest children, siblings or other relatives. The main support needs were knowing what to expect in the future and dealing with your feelings and worries. The most frequent support actions according to CSNAT-I were psychological support and medical information. Four categories summarised family caregivers and designated nurses' experiences: CSNAT-I was relevant and became an eye opener; nurses' experiences were important for enabling trustful CSNAT-I conversations; CSNAT-I provided family caregivers with support and a sense of security; and CSNAT-I gave family caregivers insight and enabled change.

conclusionBoth family caregivers and designated nurses experienced that using CSNAT-I in an HSCT context was feasible and had the potential to provide valuable support for most of the participating family caregivers.

Indexed as

CaregiversHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationChildFeasibility StudiesHumansNeeds AssessmentPalliative CareAllogeneic stem cell transplantationCancerCSNAT-IFamily caregiversFeasibility

Identifiers

PMID35951098
PMCPMC9366782
OpenAlexW4291020851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.