Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35951096›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2022

ERP evidence of heightened attentional response to visual stimuli in migraine headache disorders.

Faly Golshan, Daneil Moss, Gloria Sun, Olav Krigolson, Maria T Cruz, Janeen Loehr, Marla Mickleborough

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Faly GolshanDepartment of Psychology and Health Studies, University of Saskatchewan, 105 Administration Place, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A2, Canada. Faly.golshan@usask.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9728-6049
Daneil MossDepartment of Psychology and Health Studies, University of Saskatchewan, 105 Administration Place, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A2, Canada.
Gloria SunDepartment of Psychology and Health Studies, University of Saskatchewan, 105 Administration Place, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A2, Canada.
Olav KrigolsonUniversity of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.
Maria T CruzDepartment of Psychology and Health Studies, University of Saskatchewan, 105 Administration Place, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A2, Canada.
Janeen LoehrDepartment of Psychology and Health Studies, University of Saskatchewan, 105 Administration Place, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A2, Canada.
Marla MickleboroughDepartment of Psychology and Health Studies, University of Saskatchewan, 105 Administration Place, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A2, Canada.
University of Saskatchewan · CAUniversity of Victoria · CA

Funding

Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2016005811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New findings from migraine studies have indicated that this common headache disorder is associated with anomalies in attentional processing. In tandem with the previous explorations, this study will provide evidence to show that visual attention is impacted by migraine headache disorders. 43 individuals were initially recruited in the migraine group and 33 people with non-migraine headache disorders were in the control group. The event-related potentials (ERP) of the participants were calculated using data from a visual oddball paradigm task. By analyzing the N200 and P300 ERP components, migraineurs, as compared to controls, had an exaggerated oddball response showing increased amplitude in N200 and P300 difference scores for the oddball vs. standard, while the latencies of the two components remained the same in the migraine and control groups. We then looked at two classifications of migraine with and without aura compared to non-migraine controls. One-Way ANOVA analysis of the two migraine groups and the non-migraine control group showed that the different level of N200 and P300 amplitude mean scores was greater between migraineurs without aura and the control group while these components' latency remained the same relatively in the three groups. Our results give more neurophysiological support that people with migraine headaches have altered processing of visual attention.

Indexed as

HeadacheMigraine DisordersAnalysis of VarianceEvent-Related Potentials, P300Evoked PotentialsHumansReaction TimeEvent-related potentialsMigraineOddball paradigmVisual attention

Identifiers

PMID35951096
PMCPMC9458682
OpenAlexW4290805802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.