Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35951085›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2022

Endorectal ultrasound radiomics in locally advanced rectal cancer patients: despeckling and radiotherapy response prediction using machine learning.

Samira Abbaspour, Hamid Abdollahi, Hossein Arabalibeik, Maedeh Barahman, Amir Mohammad Arefpour, Pedram Fadavi, Mohammadreza Ay, Seied Rabi Mahdavi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Role of Digital Technology in Preventing Anemia Among Pregnant Women: A Scoping Review.International journal of telemedicine and applications · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Samira AbbaspourMedical Physics and Biomedical Engineering Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hamid AbdollahiDepartment of Radiology Technology, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Hossein ArabalibeikResearch Center for Science and Technology in Medicine (RCSTM), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Maedeh BarahmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Firoozgar Hospital, Firoozgar Clinical Research Development Center (FCRDC), Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Amir Mohammad ArefpourDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Firoozgar Hospital, Firoozgar Clinical Research Development Center (FCRDC), Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Pedram FadaviDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammadreza AyMedical Physics and Biomedical Engineering Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. mohammadreza_ay@tums.ac.ir.
Seied Rabi MahdaviDepartment of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. srmahdavi@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1973-2140

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe current study aimed to evaluate the association of endorectal ultrasound (EUS) radiomics features at different denoising filters based on machine learning algorithms and to predict radiotherapy response in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients.

methodsThe EUS images of forty-three LARC patients, as a predictive biomarker for predicting the treatment response of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT), were investigated. For despeckling, the EUS images were preprocessed by traditional filters (bilateral, wiener, lee, frost, median, and wavelet filters). The rectal tumors were delineated by two readers separately, and radiomics features were extracted. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator were used for feature selection. Classifiers including logistic regression (LR), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), random forest, naive Bayes, and decision tree were trained using stratified fivefold cross-validation for model development. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve followed by accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and specificity were obtained for model performance assessment.

resultsThe wavelet filter had the best results with means of AUC: 0.83, accuracy: 77.41%, precision: 82.15%, and sensitivity: 79.41%. LR and SVM by having AUC: 0.71 and 0.76; accuracy: 70.0% and 71.5%; precision: 75.0% and 73.0%; sensitivity: 69.8% and 80.2%; and specificity: 70.0% and 60.9% had the highest model's performance, respectively.

conclusionThis study demonstrated that the EUS-based radiomics model could serve as pretreatment biomarkers in predicting pathologic features of rectal cancer. The wavelet filter and machine learning methods (LR and SVM) had good results on the EUS images of rectal cancer.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingRectal NeoplasmsBayes TheoremHumansMachine LearningRectumRetrospective StudiesDenoising filtersMachine learningRadiomics featuresRectal cancerTreatment responseUltrasound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.