Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35950856›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022

Comparative Assessment of Filtration- and Precipitation-Based Methods for the Concentration of SARS-CoV-2 and Other Viruses from Wastewater.

Kata Farkas, Cameron Pellett, Natasha Alex-Sanders, Matthew T P Bridgman, Alexander Corbishley, Jasmine M S Grimsley, Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern, Jessica L Kevill, Igor Pântea, India S Richardson-O'Neill and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Tracking epidemic viruses in wastewaters.Microbial biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kata FarkasCentre for Environmental Biotechnology, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor Universitygrid.7362.0, Bangor, Gwynedd, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7068-3228
Cameron PellettCentre for Environmental Biotechnology, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor Universitygrid.7362.0, Bangor, Gwynedd, United Kingdom.
Natasha Alex-SandersCentre for Environmental Biotechnology, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor Universitygrid.7362.0, Bangor, Gwynedd, United Kingdom.
Matthew T P BridgmanCentre for Environmental Biotechnology, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor Universitygrid.7362.0, Bangor, Gwynedd, United Kingdom.
Alexander CorbishleyRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Roslin, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7902-0914
Jasmine M S GrimsleyUK Health Security Agency, Environmental Monitoring for Health Protection, London, United Kingdom.
Barbara Kasprzyk-HordernDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Jessica L KevillCentre for Environmental Biotechnology, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor Universitygrid.7362.0, Bangor, Gwynedd, United Kingdom.
Igor PânteaCentre for Environmental Biotechnology, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor Universitygrid.7362.0, Bangor, Gwynedd, United Kingdom.
India S Richardson-O'NeillCentre for Environmental Biotechnology, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor Universitygrid.7362.0, Bangor, Gwynedd, United Kingdom.
Kathryn Lambert-SlosarskaCentre for Environmental Biotechnology, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor Universitygrid.7362.0, Bangor, Gwynedd, United Kingdom.
Nick WoodhallCentre for Environmental Biotechnology, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor Universitygrid.7362.0, Bangor, Gwynedd, United Kingdom.
Davey L JonesCentre for Environmental Biotechnology, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor Universitygrid.7362.0, Bangor, Gwynedd, United Kingdom.
Bangor University · GBRoslin Institute · GBUK Health Security Agency · GBUniversity of Bath · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) has been widely used to track levels of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the community during the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the rapid expansion of WBE, many methods have been used and developed for virus concentration and detection in wastewater. However, very little information is available on the relative performance of these approaches. In this study, we compared the performance of five commonly used wastewater concentration methods for the detection and quantification of pathogenic viruses (SARS-CoV-2, norovirus, rotavirus, influenza, and measles viruses), fecal indicator viruses (crAssphage, adenovirus, pepper mild mottle virus), and process control viruses (murine norovirus and bacteriophage Phi6) in laboratory spiking experiments. The methods evaluated included those based on either ultrafiltration (Amicon centrifugation units and InnovaPrep device) or precipitation (using polyethylene glycol [PEG], beef extract-enhanced PEG, and ammonium sulfate). The two best methods were further tested on 115 unspiked wastewater samples. We found that the volume and composition of the wastewater and the characteristics of the target viruses greatly affected virus recovery, regardless of the method used for concentration. All tested methods are suitable for routine virus concentration; however, the Amicon ultrafiltration method and the beef extract-enhanced PEG precipitation methods yielded the best recoveries. We recommend the use of ultrafiltration-based concentration for low sample volumes with high virus titers and ammonium levels and the use of precipitation-based concentration for rare pathogen detection in high-volume samples.

Indexed as

COVID-19VirusesAnimalsCattleHumansMicePandemicsPolyethylene GlycolsSARS-CoV-2WastewaterPolyethylene GlycolsWastewaterenteric virusesenvironmental virologyhuman respiratory virusespublic health surveillancesewage concentration

Identifiers

PMID35950856
PMCPMC9430619
OpenAlexW4290804072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.