Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35950352›Full record

ArticleBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2022

The role of inputs of marine wrack and carrion in sandy-beach ecosystems: a global review.

Glenn A Hyndes, Emma L Berdan, Cristian Duarte, Jenifer E Dugan, Kyle A Emery, Peter A Hambäck, Christopher J Henderson, David M Hubbard, Mariano Lastra, Miguel A Mateo and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
23.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Spatial synchrony cascades across ecosystem boundaries and up food webs via resource subsidies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Glenn A HyndesCentre for Marine Ecosystems Research, School of Science, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3525-1665
Emma L BerdanDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6435-4604
Cristian DuarteDepartamento de Ecología y Biodiversidad, Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-7033-3551
Jenifer E DuganMarine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.
Kyle A EmeryMarine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0536-317X
Peter A HambäckDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6362-6199
Christopher J HendersonSchool of Science, Technology, and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9397-8064
David M HubbardMarine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.
Mariano LastraCentro de Investigación Mariña, Edificio CC Experimentais, Universidade de Vigo, Campus de Vigo, 36310, Vigo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2738-2056
Miguel A MateoCentre for Marine Ecosystems Research, School of Science, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7567-0277
Andrew OldsSchool of Science, Technology, and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8027-3599
Thomas A SchlacherSchool of Science, Technology, and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2184-9217
University of California, Santa Barbara · USUniversity of the Sunshine Coast · AUEdith Cowan University · AUStockholm University · SEUniversidad Andrés Bello · CLUniversidade de Vigo · ESUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sandy beaches are iconic interfaces that functionally link the ocean with the land via the flow of organic matter from the sea. These cross-ecosystem fluxes often comprise uprooted seagrass and dislodged macroalgae that can form substantial accumulations of detritus, termed 'wrack', on sandy beaches. In addition, the tissue of the carcasses of marine animals that regularly wash up on beaches form a rich food source ('carrion') for a diversity of scavenging animals. Here, we provide a global review of how wrack and carrion provide spatial subsidies that shape the structure and functioning of sandy-beach ecosystems (sandy beaches and adjacent surf zones), which typically have little in situ primary production. We also examine the spatial scaling of the influence of these processes across the broader land- and seascape, and identify key gaps in our knowledge to guide future research directions and priorities. Large quantities of detrital kelp and seagrass can flow into sandy-beach ecosystems, where microbial decomposers and animals process it. The rates of wrack supply and its retention are influenced by the oceanographic processes that transport it, the geomorphology and landscape context of the recipient beaches, and the condition, life history and morphological characteristics of the macrophyte taxa that are the ultimate source of wrack. When retained in beach ecosystems, wrack often creates hotspots of microbial metabolism, secondary productivity, biodiversity, and nutrient remineralization. Nutrients are produced during wrack breakdown, and these can return to coastal waters in surface flows (swash) and aquifers discharging into the subtidal surf. Beach-cast kelp often plays a key trophic role, being an abundant and preferred food source for mobile, semi-aquatic invertebrates that channel imported algal matter to predatory invertebrates, fish, and birds. The role of beach-cast marine carrion is likely to be underestimated, as it can be consumed rapidly by highly mobile scavengers (e.g. foxes, coyotes, raptors, vultures). These consumers become important vectors in transferring marine productivity inland, thereby linking marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Whilst deposits of organic matter on sandy-beach ecosystems underpin a range of ecosystem functions and services, they can be at variance with aesthetic perceptions resulting in widespread activities, such as 'beach cleaning and grooming'. This practice diminishes the energetic base of food webs, intertidal fauna, and biodiversity. Global declines in seagrass beds and kelp forests (linked to global warming) are predicted to cause substantial reductions in the amounts of marine organic matter reaching many beach ecosystems, likely causing flow-on effects for food webs and biodiversity. Similarly, future sea-level rise and increased storm frequency are likely to alter profoundly the physical attributes of beaches, which in turn can change the rates at which beaches retain and process the influxes of wrack and animal carcasses. Conservation of the multi-faceted ecosystem services that sandy beaches provide will increasingly need to encompass a greater societal appreciation and the safeguarding of ecological functions reliant on beach-cast organic matter on innumerable ocean shores worldwide.

Indexed as

EcosystemInvertebratesAnimalsBiodiversityBirdsFishesFood Chaincarrioncoastal ecosystemsdetritusecosystem functioningkelp forestslandscape ecologyseagrass bedsseascapespatial subsidywrack

Identifiers

PMID35950352
PMCPMC9804821
OpenAlexW4291019062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.