Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35950281›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2022

Effect of acquisition techniques, latest kernels, and advanced monoenergetic post-processing for stent visualization with third-generation dual-source CT.

Christoph Artzner, Gerd Grözinger, Manuel Kolb, Sven S Walter, Sergios Gatidis, Malte N Bongers

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christoph ArtznerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Gerd GrözingerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Manuel KolbDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Sven S WalterDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Sergios GatidisDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Malte N BongersDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to systematically evaluate the effect of tube voltage, current kernels, and monoenergetic post-processing on stent visualization. METHODS A 6 mm chrome-cobalt peripheral stent was placed in a dedicated phantom and scanned with the available tube voltage settings of a third-generation dual-source scanner in single-energy (SE) and dual-energy (DE) mode. Images were reconstructed using the latest convolution kernels and monoenergetic reconstructions (40-190 keV) for DE. The sharpness of stent struts (S), struts width (SW), contrast-to-noise-ratios (CNR), and pseudoenhancement (PE) between the vessel with and without stent were analyzed using an in-house built automatic analysis tool. Measurements were standardized through calculated z-scores. Z-scores were combined for stent (SQ), luminal (LQ), and overall depiction quality (OQ) by adding S and SW, CNR and SW and PE, and S and SW and CNR and PE. Two readers rated overall stent depiction on a 5-point Likert-scale. Agreement was calculated using linear-weighted kappa. Correlations were calculated using Spearman correlation coefficient. RESULTS Maximum values of S and CNR were 169.1 HU/pixel for [DE; 100/ Sn 150 kV; Qr59; 40 keV] and 50.0 for [SE; 70 kV; Bv36]. Minimum values of SW and PE were 2.615 mm for [DE; 80 to 90/ Sn 150 kV; Qr59; 140 to 190 keV] and 0.12 HU for [DE; 80/ Sn 150 kV; Qr36; 190 keV]. Best combined z-scores of SQ, LQ, and OQ were 4.53 for [DE; 100/ Sn 150 kV; Qr 59; 40 keV], 1.23 for [DE; 100/ Sn 150 kV; Qr59; 140 keV] and 2.95 for [DE; 90/ Sn 150 kV; Qr59; 50 keV]. Best OQ of SE was ranked third with 2.89 for [SE; 90 kV; Bv59]. Subjective agreement was excellent (kappa=0.86; P < .001) and correlated well with OQ (rs=0.94, P < .001). CONCLUSION Combining DE computed tomography (CT) acquisition with the latest kernels and monoenergetic post-processing allows for improved stent visualization as compared with SECT. The best overall results were obtained for monoenergetic reconstructions with 50 keV from DECT 90/Sn 150 kV acquisitions using kernel Qr59.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansPhantoms, ImagingRetrospective StudiesSignal-To-Noise RatioStents

Identifiers

PMID35950281
PMCPMC9634938
OpenAlexW4290652613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.