Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35950144›Full record

ArticleCase reports in dermatology

Diagnostic Histopathological Findings on a Tick-Bite Lesion without the Presence of an Insect Body.

Tomoaki Takada

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in dermatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tomoaki TakadaSumikawa Takada Dermatology Clinic, Sapporo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tick bite is detected when the insect's body remains, and portions, such as the mouthparts, may be used to confirm the species and the potential for microbial infection. Moreover, a histopathological diagnostic standard for tick-borne illnesses has not yet been established. Thus, this study aimed to perform a histopathological examination of the lesion in a patient in whom a tick was not identified along with its bite. The patient was a 47-year-old man who presented with a lesion caused by a tick bite; the lesion was resected en bloc from the subcutaneous fat on the left side of the neck. Histopathological findings showed necrosis and thickening of the epidermis, ulceration, a strong periodic acid-Schiff stain-positive substance over the epidermis, extravascular exposure of erythrocytes in the dermis, thrombi, sclerosis of collagenous fibers, pseudolymphoma with a predominance of T cells, and marked infiltration of basophils extending from the epidermis to the subdermal sebaceous layer. Tick-bite lesions may be detected histopathologically, even if the presence of the insect body is not confirmed, as in this case, if the injection of tick saliva and local reaction of the salivary component are histologically evaluated.

Indexed as

Acquired tick resistanceBasophilCement substanceCutaneous pseudolymphomaTick bite

Identifiers

PMID35950144
PMCPMC9251451
OpenAlexW4283013365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.