Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35950138›Full record

ArticlePostepy dermatologii i alergologii2022

A study of attitudes among Polish dermatologists and dermatology trainees regarding modern technologies in medicine.

Sebastian Patrzyk, Wojciech Bielecki, Anna Woźniacka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sebastian PatrzykDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Wojciech BieleckiDepartment of Social Pathologies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Anna WoźniackaDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Medical University of Lodz · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Dermatology offers great potential for the use of modern technologies such as remote online consultations, initial diagnostics via smartphone and computer applications, and artificial intelligence (AI)-based support for doctors. Aim: To investigate the attitude of dermatologists to such technologies. Material and methods: The participants completed a paper questionnaire comprising 16 questions regarding data such as age, gender and advancement in specialization, as well as views on the safety, benefits and future role of technologies such as AI and telemedicine in the future of medicine. The participants were chosen by snowball sampling. In total, 140 questionnaires were obtained; this was reduced to 90 by removing 50 respondents who were not familiar with term "telemedicine". The obtained data were subjected to statistical analysis. Results: The prevailing opinion was that while AI will not be able to replace doctors in the future, it could be used to improve the skills of medical personnel. Among the possible applications of these technologies in medicine, most of the responses indicated disease prevention (32%) and education (26%). None of the participants indicated that telemedicine could completely replace the traditional visit to the doctor's office. Conclusions: While the connection between medicine and modern technology is becoming stronger, most respondents believe that it is not possible for technologies such as AI or telemedicine to replace the work of human doctors.

Indexed as

applicationsartificial intelligencedermatologymodern technologiestelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35950138
PMCPMC9326912
OpenAlexW4285613137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.