Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35950042›Full record

ReviewBJUI compass2022

Utility of urinary biomarkers in primary haematuria: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nicolas Adrianto Soputro, Dylan Neil Gracias, Brendan Hermenigildo Dias, Tatenda Nzenza, Helen O'Connell, Kapil Sethi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJUI compass, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicolas Adrianto SoputroDepartment of Urology Western Health Footscray Victoria 3011 Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5419-0327
Dylan Neil GraciasMelbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Health Sciences University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria 3010 Australia.
Brendan Hermenigildo DiasDepartment of Urology Western Health Footscray Victoria 3011 Australia.
Tatenda NzenzaDepartment of Urology Western Health Footscray Victoria 3011 Australia.
Helen O'ConnellDepartment of Urology Western Health Footscray Victoria 3011 Australia.
Kapil SethiDepartment of Urology Western Health Footscray Victoria 3011 Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUFootscray Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of FDA-approved urinary biomarkers in the evaluation of primary haematuria for investigation of bladder cancer. Methods: The scientific databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Pubmed and Web of Science were searched to collect studies. Studies that evaluated the diagnostic performance of FDA-approved urinary biomarkers in investigating patients with primary haematuria without a prior history of bladder cancer were included. Quality of studies was assessed using the JBI Criteria. Bivariate mixed-effects regression model was used to calculate pooled sensitivities and specificities for each biomarker. Results: Eighteen studies were included in the analysis. The biomarkers assessed in these studies were CxBladder, AssureMDx, Bladder Tumour Antigen (BTA), NMP22, UroVysion and Immunocyt/uCyt+. Several biomarkers, such as AssureMDx, CxBladder and Immunocyt, were shown to have better diagnostic performance based on their sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio, as well as positive and negative likelihood ratios. Across the six biomarkers, sensitivity ranged from 0.659 to 0.973, and the specificity ranged between 0.577 and 0.833. Conclusion: Despite certain biomarkers demonstrated better performance, current diagnostic abilities of the FDA-approved biomarkers remain insufficient for their general application as a rule out test for bladder cancer diagnosis and as a triage test for cystoscopy in patients with primary haematuria. High-quality prospective studies are required to further analyse this and also analyse the correct scenario in which urinary biomarkers may be best utilised.

Indexed as

biomarkerbladder cancerhaematuria

Identifiers

PMID35950042
PMCPMC9349596
OpenAlexW4220994071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.