ArticleCase reports in ophthalmology
ILM Flap Repositioning for Persistent Macular Hole.
Article in Case reports in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a case of a persistent macular hole which was initially treated by pars plana vitrectomy with the inverted ILM flap technique. In a second procedure, the internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap was mobilized from its perifoveal adherence to the retina and peeled back to its adherence at the foveal ring. The eye was filled with 25% C2F6 gas. Three weeks after the second procedure, closure of the hole was observed. Best corrected visual acuity increased from 20/400 to 20/50. We assume that contractile elements within the ILM may cause perifoveal adhesion and centrifugal effects preventing macular hole closure. If macular hole closure does not occur after surgery with an inverted ILM flap, it is worth to peel back the existing flap again towards the foveal edge in order to induce hole closure and preserve the benefits of flap surgery. If the flap is only attached to the foveal ring, centripetal contraction could lead to annular closure of the macular hole. If the flap is lost, alternative surgical methods for refractory MHs should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.