Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35950013›Full record

ArticleBiomedicine hub

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cardiovascular Medications in Neonatal Hypotension.

Kosmas Sarafidis, Eleni Verykouki, Stefanos Nikopoulos, Fani Apostolidou-Kiouti, Theodoros Diakonidis, Eleni Agakidou, Aggeliki Kontou, Anna-Bettina Haidich

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicine hub. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kosmas Sarafidis1st Department of Neonatology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Hppokrateion General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Eleni VerykoukiDepartment of Hygiene, Social-Preventive Medicine & Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Stefanos Nikopoulos1st Department of Neonatology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Hppokrateion General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Fani Apostolidou-KioutiDepartment of Hygiene, Social-Preventive Medicine & Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Theodoros DiakonidisDepartment of Hygiene, Social-Preventive Medicine & Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Eleni Agakidou1st Department of Neonatology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Hppokrateion General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Aggeliki Kontou1st Department of Neonatology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Hppokrateion General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Anna-Bettina HaidichDepartment of Hygiene, Social-Preventive Medicine & Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Comparative studies among the various cardiovascular medications used for the treatment of neonatal hypotension are lacking. Methods: This systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis of the anti-hypotensive treatments in preterm and term infants was conducted to evaluate efficacy and impact on outcome. Electronic databases were searched up to February 2021 for relevant articles. As an extension of the current approach for study selection, a machine learning technique was used. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of inotropes, pressors, volume therapy, and corticosteroids were included. Response to treatment was the primary outcome while secondary outcomes included mortality and common morbidities. Results: Nineteen RCTs involving 758 preterm and term neonates were found, and 8 treatments were evaluated. Most studies involved subjects with early hypotension associated with prematurity. Pairwise meta-analysis among treatments showed that dopamine was more effective than dobutamine regarding the response to treatment (restoration of normotension or normalization of blood pressure) (7 trials, 286 neonates, odds ratio, 3.06 [95% CI = 1.06-8.87]; Conclusion: In this systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis, only the comparison of dopamine versus dobutamine provided evidence for efficacy of treatment and favored dopamine. No safe conclusions could be reached in regard to other treatments. Data regarding the management of arterial hypotension in conditions other than transition after birth in preterm newborns are sparse both in preterm and term infants.

Indexed as

Arterial hypotensionDobutamineDopamineNeonate

Identifiers

PMID35950013
PMCPMC9251481
OpenAlexW4282920784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.