Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35949961›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation2022

Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in the management of complex regional pain syndrome type 1: A randomized-controlled trial.

İsmail Cömertoğlu, Seçilay Güneş, Atilla Halil Elhan, Evren Üstüner, Şehim Kutlay, Ayşe Adile Küçükdeveci

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05922618 (PEMFS in Patients With CRPS-I of the Foot and Ankle), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05922618 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

PEMFS in Patients With CRPS-I of the Foot and Ankle: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di BariRan2023 to 2025Enrolled28ConditionsPain, Joint, Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, Ankle Disease, Foot DiseasesArmsI-One
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SIMFER guidelines on physical modalities for chronic primary pain management.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

İsmail CömertoğluDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Avicenna International Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6215-0328
Seçilay GüneşDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1231-7094
Atilla Halil ElhanDepartment of Biostatistics, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-3324-248X
Evren ÜstünerDepartment of Radiology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0932-1508
Şehim KutlayDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6869-6070
Ayşe Adile KüçükdeveciDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7255-7535
Ankara University · TRSema Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to investigate whether pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy in addition to a conventional rehabilitation program is effective on pain and functioning in patients with type 1 complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS-1) of the hand. Patients and methods: Between March 2013 and January 2015, a total of 32 patients (16 males, 16 females; mean age: 50.1±13.1 years; range, 25 to 75 years) were included. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups. The control group (n=16) received a conventional rehabilitation program consisting of physical modalities, exercises, and occupational therapy, whereas the PEMF group (n=16) received additional PEMF (8 Hz, 3.2 mT) to the affected hand. The primary outcome measure was pain intensity using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcome measures were grip and pinch strength, hand edema, hand dexterity, and hand activities. All patients received 20 therapy sessions (five sessions/week, four weeks in total) and were evaluated before and after the therapy and at the first-month follow-up. Results: Both groups showed significant improvements in primary and secondary outcomes (p<0.05) after the therapy and at follow-up. When the groups were compared in terms of improvements in assessment parameters, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in any of the outcomes (p>0.05). Conclusion: The PEMF in addition to conventional rehabilitation program did not provide additional benefit for pain and hand functions in CRPS-1. Future studies using different application parameters such as frequency, intensity, duration, and route may provide a better understanding of the role of PEMF in CRPS-1 treatment.

Indexed as

Complex regional pain syndromephysical therapypulsed electromagnetic fieldrehabilitationultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID35949961
PMCPMC9305649
OpenAlexW4221032898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.